Skip to content
+90 505 506 38 10
JUANA Real Estate logo List Your Property My JUANA
+90 505 506 38 10 WhatsApp
← Back to the Academy
Real estate guide

Title Deed and Ownership Verification Guide

Verify ownership before a property purchase in Türkiye: match the seller, parcel, independent unit and registered rights to current title records.

170 knowledge topics
Title Deed and Ownership Verification Guide

Match the title record to the physical property

Use a single comparison sheet for registry identifiers, seller identity, ownership share and the unit actually inspected. Request current documentation of mortgages, liens, annotations and registered rights, not merely a scan of an old title certificate. Compare the legally described area and approved use with the sale contract and any municipal or building documents. Escalate discrepancies in parcel, independent-unit number or seller authority before payment, and store dated evidence showing how each discrepancy was resolved.

Practical verification checklist

Title verification: Match province, district, block, parcel and independent-unit number across the title record, contract and site inspection. Request a current record of mortgages, attachments, annotations and easements, and confirm the seller's authority to dispose of the stated share. A photo of a deed or an old extract is not a substitute for current registry verification.

JUANA Real Estate Editorial Team

Last reviewed: 2026-08-21

Content is reviewed against official and primary sources and updated when rules or information change.

Official review sources

Topics in this guide

Türkiye Title Deed (Tapu) Guide 2026: Checks and Transfer

Türkiye Title Deed (Tapu) Guide 2026: Checks and Transfer

A guide to reading the Turkish title deed and land-registry record: property identity, owner, shares, encumbrances, independent-unit data, condominium status and closing-day verification.

Read topic →
Title Deed Encumbrances, Liens and Annotations in Türkiye

Title Deed Encumbrances, Liens and Annotations in Türkiye

A source-backed guide to Turkish title encumbrances: mortgages, attachments, annotations, easements, usufruct, removal mechanisms and closing-day checks.

Read topic →
Safer Property Payment and Web Tapu Workflow

Safer Property Payment and Web Tapu Workflow

A source-backed closing guide explaining how to use Web Tapu with registry, seller-authority, beneficiary-account and payment-timing controls for safer property purchases.

Read topic →
Title Deed Appointment Preparation

Title Deed Appointment Preparation

A practical title-deed appointment preparation guide covering final property and party checks, representation, restrictions, DASK, fees, payment, foreign-buyer documents, official messages and signing-day verification.

Read topic →
Property Address Registration Guide

Property Address Registration Guide

Property Address Registration Guide: a practical guide to build a clear, evidence-based answer to the topic itself, with emphasis on current evidence, property and party identity, document version, unresolved conflicts and the transaction consequence before commitment.

Read topic →
Property Management, Maintenance and Owner Operations Guide in Türkiye

Property Management, Maintenance and Owner Operations Guide in Türkiye

A practical Turkey property-owner operations guide covering documents, utilities, aidat, preventive maintenance, tenants, insurance, tax records, vendors, emergency access and annual review.

Read topic →
Property Owner Document Archive Checklist

Property Owner Document Archive Checklist

A property-owner document-archive guide covering title, contracts, tax, insurance, maintenance, tenancy and utility records, file naming, backups, access control, retention and sale-ready packs.

Read topic →
Annual Property Ownership Budget

Annual Property Ownership Budget

Annual Property Ownership Budget Core point Split the annual ownership budget into recurring operating costs, capital reserve and contingent costs rather than putting everything under “maintenance”. How to verify it Keep aidat, insurance, tax and routine maintenance separate from major replacements, vacancy and emergencies.

Read topic →
Fake Title Deed Red Flags

Fake Title Deed Red Flags

Use Fake Title Deed Red Flags to separate genuine warning signs from harmless irregularities and define which warning requires escalation before commitment. The guide separates verified facts from assumptions, records the competent source and date, and keeps any unresolved legal, technical, tax, payment or cost issue visible.

Read topic →
Final Property Walkthrough Before Title Transfer

Final Property Walkthrough Before Title Transfer

Use Final Property Walkthrough Before Title Transfer to build a clear, evidence-based answer to the topic itself. The guide separates verified facts from assumptions, records the competent source and date, and keeps any unresolved legal, technical, tax, payment or cost issue visible.

Read topic →
Apartment Number Floor and Title Match Check

Apartment Number Floor and Title Match Check

Use the floor plan to confirm the viewed apartment is the registered unit, especially in towers with wings or renumbering.

Read topic →
Title Deed Ownership Share Ratio Check

Title Deed Ownership Share Ratio Check

Title Deed Ownership Share Ratio Check explains how to build a clear, evidence-based answer to the topic itself, how to match evidence to the same asset and decision date, and how to convert a discrepancy into a written condition rather than a vague assurance.

Read topic →
Independent Unit Annexes and Appurtenances Check

Independent Unit Annexes and Appurtenances Check

A decision-focused guide to Independent Unit Annexes and Appurtenances Check: build a clear, evidence-based answer to the topic itself, preserve the controlling evidence, recheck material changes.

Read topic →
Title deed identity match Workflow Guide

Title deed identity match Workflow Guide

A title-deed identity-match workflow starts with the current registered owner data and the identity document that will be used for the transaction. Names, identity/passport/foreign-number data and the exact property identifiers must be consistent enough for TKGM to link the person and title.

Read topic →
Title deed identity match Risk Review

Title deed identity match Risk Review

Title deed identity match Risk Review: a practical guide to identify the material ways the topic can fail, then connect each risk to evidence and a transaction consequence, with emphasis on current evidence, property and party identity, document version, unresolved conflicts and the transaction consequence before commitment.

Read topic →
Title deed identity match Decision Framework

Title deed identity match Decision Framework

Use Title deed identity match Decision Framework to convert the evidence into a transparent proceed, proceed-with-condition, reprice, escalate or stop decision. The guide separates verified facts from assumptions, records the competent source and date, and keeps any unresolved legal, technical, tax, payment or cost issue visible.

Read topic →
Buyer Questions for Title deed identity match

Buyer Questions for Title deed identity match

Buyer Questions for Title deed identity match explains how to equip the buyer with specific questions whose answers can be checked against documents rather than sales assurances, how to match evidence to the same asset and decision date, and how to convert a discrepancy into a written condition rather than a vague assurance.

Read topic →
Closing-Day Check for Title deed identity match

Closing-Day Check for Title deed identity match

Closing-Day Check for Title deed identity match Core point Closing-day identity matching should use original/accepted documents valid on that day, not stale copies collected when the file was opened. How to verify it Match seller or representative identity to the registered right-holder and the actual closing transaction before signature and release of price.

Read topic →
Title deed identity match Recordkeeping Guide

Title deed identity match Recordkeeping Guide

Title deed identity match Recordkeeping Guide: a practical guide to preserve source, date, version, property identifiers and the final conclusion so another reviewer can reproduce the file, with emphasis on current evidence, property and party identity, document version, unresolved conflicts and the transaction consequence before commitment.

Read topic →
Title deed identity match Red Flags Guide

Title deed identity match Red Flags Guide

Title deed identity match Red Flags Guide explains how to separate genuine warning signs from harmless irregularities and define which warning requires escalation before commitment, how to match evidence to the same asset and decision date, and how to convert a discrepancy into a written condition rather than a vague assurance.

Read topic →
Independent unit number Verification Guide

Independent unit number Verification Guide

Use Independent unit number Verification Guide to verify the claimed fact from the strongest available primary evidence before relying on it. The guide separates verified facts from assumptions, records the competent source and date, and keeps any unresolved legal, technical, tax, payment or cost issue visible.

Read topic →
Independent unit number Workflow Guide

Independent unit number Workflow Guide

This article has one purpose: resolve the question raised by “Independent unit number Workflow Guide” for the topic Independent unit number. Start with unit number and floor/block, and tie both to the exact property, party and transaction date.

Read topic →
Independent unit number Risk Review

Independent unit number Risk Review

Independent unit number Risk Review: a practical guide to identify the material ways the topic can fail, then connect each risk to evidence and a transaction consequence, with emphasis on current evidence, property and party identity, document version, unresolved conflicts and the transaction consequence before commitment.

Read topic →
Independent unit number Decision Framework

Independent unit number Decision Framework

Use Independent unit number Decision Framework to convert the evidence into a transparent proceed, proceed-with-condition, reprice, escalate or stop decision. The guide separates verified facts from assumptions, records the competent source and date, and keeps any unresolved legal, technical, tax, payment or cost issue visible.

Read topic →
Buyer Questions for Independent unit number

Buyer Questions for Independent unit number

Buyer Questions for Independent unit number explains how to equip the buyer with specific questions whose answers can be checked against documents rather than sales assurances, how to match evidence to the same asset and decision date, and how to convert a discrepancy into a written condition rather than a vague assurance.

Read topic →
Closing-Day Check for Independent unit number

Closing-Day Check for Independent unit number

A decision-focused guide to Closing-Day Check for Independent unit number: recheck the facts that can change at closing and make payment or signature conditional on the latest evidence, preserve the controlling evidence, recheck material changes.

Read topic →
Independent unit number Recordkeeping Guide

Independent unit number Recordkeeping Guide

This article has one purpose: resolve the question raised by “Independent unit number Recordkeeping Guide” for the topic Independent unit number. Start with unit number and floor/block, and tie both to the exact property, party and transaction date.

Read topic →
Independent unit number Red Flags Guide

Independent unit number Red Flags Guide

Start with unit number and floor/block, and tie both to the exact property, party and transaction date. For the red flags, test the strongest claim first. If registered use conflicts with annexes, preserve both pieces of evidence and identify the reason for the conflict before treating the file as complete. Example: the file contains unit number, but approved project match cannot be verified. Do not mark “Independent unit number Red Flags Guide” complete.

Read topic →
Ownership share ratio Verification Guide

Ownership share ratio Verification Guide

“Ownership share ratio Verification Guide” engages Condominium Ownership Law No. 634 whenever the issue concerns an independent unit, common part, land share or site management. The law distinguishes independent sections, common areas and appurtenances and regulates management, common expenses and advances. An aidat amount, parking/storage right or ownership-share ratio should therefore not be accepted from a seller’s statement alone; the management plan, decision book, unit ledger, registry and approved project are checked according to the issue.

Read topic →
Ownership share ratio Workflow Guide

Ownership share ratio Workflow Guide

Start with arsa payı and numerator/denominator, and tie both to the exact property, party and transaction date. The evidence file should cover arsa payı, numerator/denominator, independent unit, project link and management/right effect. A document can be genuine yet still be unusable if it belongs to a different unit, parcel, year or transaction. For the workflow, test the strongest claim first. If independent unit conflicts with project link, preserve both pieces of evidence and identify the reason for the conflict before treating the file as complete.

Read topic →
Ownership share ratio Risk Review

Ownership share ratio Risk Review

Start with arsa payı and numerator/denominator, and tie both to the exact property, party and transaction date. If independent unit conflicts with project link, preserve both pieces of evidence and identify the reason for the conflict before treating the file as complete. Example: the file contains arsa payı, but management/right effect cannot be verified. Do not mark “Ownership share ratio Risk Review” complete.

Read topic →
Ownership share ratio Decision Framework

Ownership share ratio Decision Framework

Start with arsa payı and numerator/denominator, and tie both to the exact property, party and transaction date. For decision framework, test the strongest claim first. If independent unit conflicts with project link, preserve both pieces of evidence and identify the reason for the conflict before treating the file as complete. Example: the file contains arsa payı, but management/right effect cannot be verified. Do not mark “Ownership share ratio Decision Framework” complete.

Read topic →
Buyer Questions for Ownership share ratio

Buyer Questions for Ownership share ratio

When uncertain, request a fresh official record rather than an internal complex spreadsheet. Web Tapu allows applications for transactions such as sale, mortgage and inheritance transfer, but it does not make an earlier registry copy current evidence. If a representative acts, check the representation document against the party’s identity, scope of authority and transaction type. A mismatch in unit, share, owner or a newly added restriction requires the file to be reconciled again before payment or completion.

Read topic →
Closing-Day Check for Ownership share ratio

Closing-Day Check for Ownership share ratio

Use Closing-Day Check for Ownership share ratio to recheck the facts that can change at closing and make payment or signature conditional on the latest evidence. The guide separates verified facts from assumptions, records the competent source and date, and keeps any unresolved legal, technical, tax, payment or cost issue visible.

Read topic →
Ownership share ratio Recordkeeping Guide

Ownership share ratio Recordkeeping Guide

Start with arsa payı and numerator/denominator, and tie both to the exact property, party and transaction date. For recordkeeping, test the strongest claim first. If independent unit conflicts with project link, preserve both pieces of evidence and identify the reason for the conflict before treating the file as complete. Example: the file contains arsa payı, but management/right effect cannot be verified. Do not mark “Ownership share ratio Recordkeeping Guide” complete.

Read topic →
Ownership share ratio Red Flags Guide

Ownership share ratio Red Flags Guide

Start with arsa payı and numerator/denominator, and tie both to the exact property, party and transaction date. For the red flags, test the strongest claim first. If independent unit conflicts with project link, preserve both pieces of evidence and identify the reason for the conflict before treating the file as complete. Example: the file contains arsa payı, but management/right effect cannot be verified.

Read topic →
Condominium Ownership and Construction Servitude Due Diligence in Türkiye

Condominium Ownership and Construction Servitude Due Diligence in Türkiye

2026 update: Kat Mülkiyeti establishes the independent-ownership regime but is not itself a structural-safety certificate. Kat İrtifakı should be assessed together with the approved project, building permit and occupancy status. The five-year period relates to the building-permit completion/renewal framework, not an automatic invalidity rule for the servitude. A price holdback or payment-release gate can be used as a contractual risk-control tool, not as a statutory requirement in every deal.

Read topic →
Condominium ownership status Workflow Guide

Condominium ownership status Workflow Guide

A decision-focused guide to Condominium ownership status Workflow Guide: turn the topic into a sequenced due-diligence process with a clear owner, evidence step and completion point, preserve the controlling evidence, recheck material changes.

Read topic →
Condominium ownership status Risk Review

Condominium ownership status Risk Review

Start with Kat Mülkiyeti and independent unit, and tie both to the exact property, party and transaction date. The evidence file should cover Kat Mülkiyeti, independent unit, arsa payı, registered use and building record. A document can be genuine yet still be unusable if it belongs to a different unit, parcel, year or transaction. In “Condominium ownership status Risk Review”, apply this evidence through the risk review and reconcile condominium/ownership/status/risk to the controlling record for the same property before accepting the conclusion.

Read topic →
Condominium ownership status Decision Framework

Condominium ownership status Decision Framework

Start with Kat Mülkiyeti and independent unit, and tie both to the exact property, party and transaction date. The evidence file should cover Kat Mülkiyeti, independent unit, arsa payı, registered use and building record. A document can be genuine yet still be unusable if it belongs to a different unit, parcel, year or transaction. For the decision framework, test the strongest claim first. If arsa payı conflicts with registered use, preserve both pieces of evidence and identify the reason for the conflict before treating the file as complete.

Read topic →
Buyer Questions for Condominium ownership status

Buyer Questions for Condominium ownership status

Build the evidence set around condominium, ownership, buyer, questions, official and source. Planning, land-use, parcel-boundary and unit data should be checked with the competent municipality and TKGM/Parcel Query according to the issue. A mismatch between physical reality, permit, registry or appurtenances needs documented resolution before purchase; usable space is not automatically legally registered space. The Ministry of Environment states that building permits and occupancy permits are primarily issued by the competent municipality or administration; a seller statement is not a substitute for the official document.

Read topic →
Closing-Day Check for Condominium ownership status

Closing-Day Check for Condominium ownership status

For “Closing-Day Check for Condominium ownership status”, the land-registry record must be separated from marketing descriptions. TKGM lists party identification and, where representation is used, the representation document among sale-transaction materials; the registered owner, independent-unit details and recorded restrictions remain the controlling evidence when descriptions conflict. Names, identity or passport data and property identifiers should therefore be reconciled before signature, and the registry output relied upon should be preserved with its retrieval date.

Read topic →
Condominium ownership status Recordkeeping Guide

Condominium ownership status Recordkeeping Guide

Start with Kat Mülkiyeti and independent unit, and tie both to the exact property, party and transaction date. For the recordkeeping, test the strongest claim first. If arsa payı conflicts with registered use, preserve both pieces of evidence and identify the reason for the conflict before treating the file as complete. Example: the file contains Kat Mülkiyeti, but building record cannot be verified. Do not mark “Condominium ownership status Recordkeeping Guide” complete.

Read topic →
Condominium ownership status Red Flags Guide

Condominium ownership status Red Flags Guide

Start with Kat Mülkiyeti and independent unit, and tie both to the exact property, party and transaction date. The evidence file should cover Kat Mülkiyeti, independent unit, arsa payı, registered use and building record. A document can be genuine yet still be unusable if it belongs to a different unit, parcel, year or transaction. In “Condominium ownership status Red Flags Guide”, apply this evidence through the red-flag review and reconcile condominium/ownership/status/flags to the controlling record for the same property before accepting the conclusion.

Read topic →
Construction servitude status Verification Guide

Construction servitude status Verification Guide

Start with Kat İrtifakı and projected unit, and tie both to the exact property, party and transaction date. The evidence file should cover Kat İrtifakı, projected unit, arsa payı, approved project and conversion status. A document can be genuine yet still be unusable if it belongs to a different unit, parcel, year or transaction. For the verification guide focus, test the strongest claim first. If arsa payı conflicts with approved project, preserve both pieces of evidence and identify the reason for the conflict before treating the file as complete.

Read topic →
Construction servitude status Workflow Guide

Construction servitude status Workflow Guide

Use Construction servitude status Workflow Guide to turn the topic into a sequenced due-diligence process with a clear owner, evidence step and completion point. The guide separates verified facts from assumptions, records the competent source and date, and keeps any unresolved legal, technical, tax, payment or cost issue visible.

Read topic →
Construction servitude status Risk Review

Construction servitude status Risk Review

Risks include treating Kat İrtifakı as equivalent to Kat Mülkiyeti, buying a unit that differs from the approved project, delayed/missing occupancy permit, or a completed building remaining in servitude status for years. Investigate the reason and present facts rather than judging from the label alone. Kat irtifakı is not, by itself, a finding that a property is unbuyable. The risk assessment asks what legal and construction stage the building has actually reached.

Read topic →
Construction servitude status Decision Framework

Construction servitude status Decision Framework

Start with Kat İrtifakı and projected unit, and tie both to the exact property, party and transaction date. For the decision framework, test the strongest claim first. If arsa payı conflicts with approved project, preserve both pieces of evidence and identify the reason for the conflict before treating the file as complete. Record source, date, property identifiers, open exception, responsible person and next action. This turns the page into transaction evidence rather than boilerplate.

Read topic →
Buyer Questions for Construction servitude status

Buyer Questions for Construction servitude status

Buyer Questions for Construction servitude status: a practical guide to equip the buyer with specific questions whose answers can be checked against documents rather than sales assurances, with emphasis on current evidence, property and party identity, document version, unresolved conflicts and the transaction consequence before commitment.

Read topic →
Closing-Day Check for Construction servitude status

Closing-Day Check for Construction servitude status

Closing-Day Check for Construction servitude status Before closing review the newest registry plus permit/occupancy status. If conversion to Kat Mülkiyeti is promised before or after sale, document responsibility and timing rather than relying on an oral assurance. Kat İrtifakı construction servitude status: Kat İrtifakı is a project-linked legal status before full condominium ownership; the approved project, permit and occupancy status therefore need separate checking rather than treating it as automatically equivalent to Kat Mülkiyeti.

Read topic →
Construction servitude status Recordkeeping Guide

Construction servitude status Recordkeeping Guide

Construction servitude status Recordkeeping Guide Keep the registry, project drawing identifying the unit, building permit, available occupancy evidence, and conversion filings/correspondence. Together they show legal position and project progression. Record uncertainty explicitly instead of assuming clean status. Kat İrtifakı construction servitude status: Kat İrtifakı is a project-linked legal status before full condominium ownership; the approved project, permit and occupancy status therefore need separate checking rather than treating it as automatically equivalent to Kat Mülkiyeti.

Read topic →
Construction servitude status Red Flags Guide

Construction servitude status Red Flags Guide

Start with Kat İrtifakı and projected unit, and tie both to the exact property, party and transaction date. For the red flags, test the strongest claim first. If arsa payı conflicts with approved project, preserve both pieces of evidence and identify the reason for the conflict before treating the file as complete. Finish with one operational status: PASS, CONDITIONAL or STOP. Record source, date, property identifiers, open exception, responsible person and next action.

Read topic →
Title annotations and encumbrances Verification Guide

Title annotations and encumbrances Verification Guide

A practical guide to Turkish title annotations and encumbrances: obtain a current registry record, read the full takyidat set including annotations, declarations, easements, real-estate charges and mortgages, determine the effect of each item on transfer, use or financing, and recheck before closing rather than relying on an old title image.

Read topic →
Title annotations and encumbrances Workflow Guide

Title annotations and encumbrances Workflow Guide

Title annotations and encumbrances Workflow Guide Use this workflow: current TKGM/Web Tapu record → identify every entry by type, date and beneficiary/authority → determine whether it remains active or has been deleted → assess impact on transfer, financing and intended use → recheck at closing. An entry does not always block a sale, but a non-blocking entry can still matter materially. title annotations and encumbrances: Paying a mortgage debt does not by itself remove the mortgage from the registry; TKGM says the bank sends the release document electronically to the Land Registry Directorate for cancellation.

Read topic →
Title annotations and encumbrances Risk Review

Title annotations and encumbrances Risk Review

Encumbrance review starts from a current land-register record, not an old title image. TKGM uses the term Takyidat for restrictions, annotations and rights such as declarations and easements that affect ownership. A mortgage, attachment, annotation and easement must be distinguished because their legal and commercial consequences are not the same. Repaying a mortgage debt also does not by itself prove that the registry entry has been cancelled; deletion must be verified in the register.

Read topic →
Title annotations and encumbrances Decision Framework

Title annotations and encumbrances Decision Framework

For the decision framework, test the strongest claim first. If annotations conflicts with easements/declarations, preserve both pieces of evidence and identify the reason for the conflict before treating the file as complete. Test annotations independently before using decision as supporting evidence. This prevents a secondary document from validating an incorrect primary assumption. Build a short contradiction note: what the seller says about decision; what the official record shows; what the physical or payment evidence shows; and what must happen if they disagree.

Read topic →
Buyer Questions for Title annotations and encumbrances

Buyer Questions for Title annotations and encumbrances

Buyer Questions for Title annotations and encumbrances: a practical guide to equip the buyer with specific questions whose answers can be checked against documents rather than sales assurances, with emphasis on current evidence, property and party identity, document version, unresolved conflicts and the transaction consequence before commitment.

Read topic →
Closing-Day Check for Title annotations and encumbrances

Closing-Day Check for Title annotations and encumbrances

Use Closing-Day Check for Title annotations and encumbrances to recheck the facts that can change at closing and make payment or signature conditional on the latest evidence. The guide separates verified facts from assumptions, records the competent source and date, and keeps any unresolved legal, technical, tax, payment or cost issue visible.

Read topic →
Title annotations and encumbrances Recordkeeping Guide

Title annotations and encumbrances Recordkeeping Guide

Title annotations and encumbrances Recordkeeping Guide explains how to preserve source, date, version, property identifiers and the final conclusion so another reviewer can reproduce the file, how to match evidence to the same asset and decision date, and how to convert a discrepancy into a written condition rather than a vague assurance.

Read topic →
Title annotations and encumbrances Red Flags Guide

Title annotations and encumbrances Red Flags Guide

For the red flags, test the strongest claim first. If annotations conflicts with easements/declarations, preserve both pieces of evidence and identify the reason for the conflict before treating the file as complete. Test annotations independently before using flags as supporting evidence. This prevents a secondary document from validating an incorrect primary assumption. Red flags include refusal to provide a fresh registry extract, “the mortgage is paid” while it remains registered, several unexplained restrictions, a mismatched right-holder name, demand for full payment before an agreed release, or reliance on an unverifiable screenshot.

Read topic →
Title-Deed Fees, Property Taxes, Mortgages, Attachments and Aidat Due Diligence

Title-Deed Fees, Property Taxes, Mortgages, Attachments and Aidat Due Diligence

A 2026 verification guide to Turkish title-transfer charges: calculate title-deed fee from the genuine declared transfer value subject to the statutory property-tax-value floor, separate the title fee from TKGM service charges, use the current annual tariff and official payment channels, and preserve transaction-specific receipts.

Read topic →
Title Transfer Fees Workflow Guide in Türkiye

Title Transfer Fees Workflow Guide in Türkiye

A practical workflow for calculating Turkish title-transfer charges, validating the value base, separating title-deed tax from revolving-fund fees, obtaining official collection references, paying through official channels and reconciling receipts before registration.

Read topic →
Title Transfer Fees Risk Review in Türkiye

Title Transfer Fees Risk Review in Türkiye

A risk review focused on value-base errors, outdated tariffs, mixing public charges with private costs, wrong collection references, payment-channel changes and how to convert each risk into a documented hold or remediation decision.

Read topic →
Title Transfer Fees Decision Framework in Türkiye

Title Transfer Fees Decision Framework in Türkiye

A decision framework that converts value, fee, tariff and collection evidence into a proceed, conditional proceed, recalculate, escalate or stop decision, with explicit evidence needed to close each discrepancy.

Read topic →
Buyer Questions for Title Transfer Fees in Türkiye

Buyer Questions for Title Transfer Fees in Türkiye

Specific buyer questions to verify the fee base, each party’s statutory amount, current revolving-fund tariff, collection reference, payment channel and receipts before money is released.

Read topic →
Closing-Day Check for Title Transfer Fees in Türkiye

Closing-Day Check for Title Transfer Fees in Türkiye

Final pre-signing and pre-payment recheck of value base, buyer/seller charges, current tariff, collection reference, payment channel, receipts and private cost allocation.

Read topic →
Title Transfer Fees Recordkeeping Guide in Türkiye

Title Transfer Fees Recordkeeping Guide in Türkiye

A recordkeeping system linking fee calculations to value base, tariff, collection reference, receipts, property and parties, while preserving change history and private cost allocation separately.

Read topic →
Title Transfer Fees Red Flags

Title Transfer Fees Red Flags

Title-deed transfer fees and associated taxes form part of the total cost of a property transaction. Certain financial or administrative indicators surrounding those charges may, however, point to hidden violations, attempted tax evasion or manipulation of the property's declared value before public authorities. These are important transaction red flags.

Read topic →
Title Deed Identity Match Official Source Revalidation

Title Deed Identity Match Official Source Revalidation

Revalidation of identity matching in the title deed means returning to the competent official or otherwise authoritative source to confirm that the information previously reviewed is still current and corresponds to the same property and parties. It is particularly important before final reliance on identity or ownership-related information.

Read topic →
Validity and Deadline Control — Title deed identity match

Validity and Deadline Control — Title deed identity match

Validity and Deadline Control — Title deed identity match explains how to track issue dates, expiry dates, renewal rules and cut-off dates so an otherwise correct document does not become unusable at the critical moment, how to match evidence to the same asset and decision date, and how to convert a discrepancy into a written condition rather than a vague assurance.

Read topic →
Counterparty Confirmation — Title deed identity match

Counterparty Confirmation — Title deed identity match

A decision-focused guide to Counterparty Confirmation — Title deed identity match: obtain independent confirmation of material facts from the responsible party or issuer instead of relying on a forwarded copy alone, preserve the controlling evidence, recheck material changes.

Read topic →
Title Deed Identity Match Exception Register

Title Deed Identity Match Exception Register

The exception register for identity matching in the title deed records discrepancies, missing evidence and unusual conditions found during due diligence. It provides a controlled way to ensure that a problem is not forgotten or treated as closed without supporting evidence.

Read topic →
Title Deed Identity Match Payment Release Gate

Title Deed Identity Match Payment Release Gate

The payment-release gate for identity matching in the title deed links the movement of funds to completion of material due-diligence conditions. Its purpose is to avoid releasing final funds while a significant identity, ownership, document or transaction exception remains unresolved.

Read topic →
Official Source Revalidation — Independent unit number

Official Source Revalidation — Independent unit number

Revalidate the independent-unit number from current title/condominium records so the apartment inspected is the legal unit being purchased.

Read topic →
Exception Register — Independent unit number

Exception Register — Independent unit number

Exception Register — Independent unit number: a practical guide to record every unresolved exception with its owner, impact, deadline, evidence needed and closure status, with emphasis on current evidence, property and party identity, document version, unresolved conflicts and the transaction consequence before commitment.

Read topic →
Change Control — Independent unit number

Change Control — Independent unit number

Change Control — Independent unit number explains how to keep material changes visible, versioned and reapproved before relying on an earlier conclusion, how to match evidence to the same asset and decision date, and how to convert a discrepancy into a written condition rather than a vague assurance.

Read topic →
Resale File Preservation — Independent unit number

Resale File Preservation — Independent unit number

Use Resale File Preservation — Independent unit number to preserve the evidence a future buyer, lender or adviser will need to understand the asset without rebuilding the file from zero. The guide separates verified facts from assumptions, records the competent source and date, and keeps any unresolved legal, technical, tax, payment or cost issue visible.

Read topic →
Official Source Revalidation — Ownership share ratio

Official Source Revalidation — Ownership share ratio

Revalidate the ownership-share ratio from the current title record and read it as a registered share, not as an assumed floor-area percentage.

Read topic →
Validity and Deadline Control — Ownership share ratio

Validity and Deadline Control — Ownership share ratio

Recheck the share ratio whenever the condominium plan, unit structure or title record changes; an old ratio should not be assumed current.

Read topic →
Counterparty Confirmation — Ownership share ratio

Counterparty Confirmation — Ownership share ratio

Use Counterparty Confirmation — Ownership share ratio to obtain independent confirmation of material facts from the responsible party or issuer instead of relying on a forwarded copy alone. The guide separates verified facts from assumptions, records the competent source and date, and keeps any unresolved legal, technical, tax, payment or cost issue visible.

Read topic →
Change Control — Ownership share ratio

Change Control — Ownership share ratio

Change Control — Ownership share ratio: a practical guide to keep material changes visible, versioned and reapproved before relying on an earlier conclusion, with emphasis on current evidence, property and party identity, document version, unresolved conflicts and the transaction consequence before commitment.

Read topic →
Resale File Preservation — Ownership share ratio

Resale File Preservation — Ownership share ratio

A decision-focused guide to Resale File Preservation — Ownership share ratio: preserve the evidence a future buyer, lender or adviser will need to understand the asset without rebuilding the file from zero, preserve the controlling evidence, recheck material changes.

Read topic →
Counterparty Confirmation — Condominium ownership status

Counterparty Confirmation — Condominium ownership status

A decision-focused guide to Counterparty Confirmation — Condominium ownership status: obtain independent confirmation of material facts from the responsible party or issuer instead of relying on a forwarded copy alone, preserve the controlling evidence, recheck material changes.

Read topic →
Property Boundaries and Area Risk Review

Property Boundaries and Area Risk Review

A risk review of property boundaries and area is intended to identify weaknesses that may be hidden by apparently complete paperwork. The review considers whether the records are current, authentic, internally consistent and aligned with the actual property or service. It also asks whether missing or inaccurate information could create legal, financial, safety or operating costs for the buyer.

Read topic →
Property Boundaries and Area Decision Framework

Property Boundaries and Area Decision Framework

The decision framework for property boundaries and area converts document review into a controlled transaction decision. It is designed to prevent a buyer from proceeding merely because a document exists; the document must also be current, relevant, consistent and sufficiently verified.

Read topic →
Change Control — Condominium ownership status

Change Control — Condominium ownership status

Change Control — Condominium ownership status explains how to keep material changes visible, versioned and reapproved before relying on an earlier conclusion, how to match evidence to the same asset and decision date, and how to convert a discrepancy into a written condition rather than a vague assurance.

Read topic →
Resale File Preservation — Condominium ownership status

Resale File Preservation — Condominium ownership status

Use Resale File Preservation — Condominium ownership status to preserve the evidence a future buyer, lender or adviser will need to understand the asset without rebuilding the file from zero. The guide separates verified facts from assumptions, records the competent source and date, and keeps any unresolved legal, technical, tax, payment or cost issue visible.

Read topic →
Official Source Revalidation — Construction servitude status

Official Source Revalidation — Construction servitude status

A decision-focused guide to Official Source Revalidation — Construction servitude status: return to the competent official source and verify that the prior conclusion still matches the current rule or record, preserve the controlling evidence, recheck material changes.

Read topic →
Counterparty Confirmation — Construction servitude status

Counterparty Confirmation — Construction servitude status

Use Counterparty Confirmation — Construction servitude status to obtain independent confirmation of material facts from the responsible party or issuer instead of relying on a forwarded copy alone. The guide separates verified facts from assumptions, records the competent source and date, and keeps any unresolved legal, technical, tax, payment or cost issue visible.

Read topic →
Exception Register — Construction servitude status

Exception Register — Construction servitude status

Exception Register — Construction servitude status explains how to record every unresolved exception with its owner, impact, deadline, evidence needed and closure status, how to match evidence to the same asset and decision date, and how to convert a discrepancy into a written condition rather than a vague assurance.

Read topic →
Payment Release Gate — Construction servitude status

Payment Release Gate — Construction servitude status

A decision-focused guide to Payment Release Gate — Construction servitude status: define the evidence that must exist before a specific payment is released and block payment when a required condition remains unresolved, preserve the controlling evidence, recheck material changes.

Read topic →
Change Control — Construction servitude status

Change Control — Construction servitude status

Change Control — Construction servitude status: a practical guide to keep material changes visible, versioned and reapproved before relying on an earlier conclusion, with emphasis on current evidence, property and party identity, document version, unresolved conflicts and the transaction consequence before commitment.

Read topic →
Resale File Preservation — Construction servitude status

Resale File Preservation — Construction servitude status

A decision-focused guide to Resale File Preservation — Construction servitude status: preserve the evidence a future buyer, lender or adviser will need to understand the asset without rebuilding the file from zero, preserve the controlling evidence, recheck material changes.

Read topic →
Official Source Revalidation — Title annotations and encumbrances

Official Source Revalidation — Title annotations and encumbrances

A decision-focused guide to Official Source Revalidation — Title annotations and encumbrances: return to the competent official source and verify that the prior conclusion still matches the current rule or record, preserve the controlling evidence, recheck material changes and leave a conclusion another reviewer can reproduce.

Read topic →
Independent Evidence Replication — Title deed identity match

Independent Evidence Replication — Title deed identity match

Owner-identity verification starts with the official registry, not a listing or an old title copy. Reconcile the registered holder, legal capacity and any representation with the latest official record and distinguish the rights holder from the person negotiating.

Read topic →
Pre-Commitment Freeze — Title deed identity match

Pre-Commitment Freeze — Title deed identity match

Pre-Commitment Freeze — Title deed identity match — Before a non-refundable deposit or binding signature, freeze a dated reference copy of the data supporting the decision. If closing is delayed or the project/registry changes, use that frozen set as a comparison baseline and recheck.

Read topic →
Document Version Reconciliation — Title deed identity match

Document Version Reconciliation — Title deed identity match

Document Version Reconciliation — Title deed identity match — Start by reconciling “A defensible review ties parcel/block, independent-unit number, ownership share and encumbrances to the exact property before any material payment.” with “TKGM and Web Tapu are primary references for matching the property, owner and transaction record; due diligence should…

Read topic →
Cost Consequence Trace — Title deed identity match

Cost Consequence Trace — Title deed identity match

Cost Consequence Trace — Title deed identity match — TKGM and Web Tapu are primary references for matching the property, owner and transaction record; due diligence should start from the official registry rather than the advertisement.

Read topic →
Resale and Exit Review — Title deed identity match

Resale and Exit Review — Title deed identity match

Resale and Exit Review — Title deed identity match — Ask how a future buyer, bank or valuer will read the same data at exit. If an item already needs lengthy explanation, document the correction or resolution before purchase instead of exporting the problem to the next sale.

Read topic →
Cross-Party Consistency Check — Title deed identity match

Cross-Party Consistency Check — Title deed identity match

Cross-Party Consistency Check — Title deed identity match — Compare the same identifiers across seller, buyer, agent, bank, valuer and municipality/management where relevant. A mismatch in owner name, block/parcel, independent-unit number or share across party files should stop reliance until the authoritative value is identified.

Read topic →
Closing-Day Recheck — Title deed identity match

Closing-Day Recheck — Title deed identity match

Start by reconciling “TKGM and Web Tapu are primary references for matching the property, owner and transaction record; due diligence should start from the official registry rather than the advertisement.” with “For foreign-buyer transactions, TKGM lists transaction documents including identity information, earthquake insurance for buildings and the foreign-exchange purchase document where applicable.”, then use “Before signing a contract or amendment that changes rights or obligations.” as an independent cross-check if they conflict. The evidence must relate to the same property and transaction period.

Read topic →
Independent Evidence Replication — Independent unit number

Independent Evidence Replication — Independent unit number

The independent-unit number is a legal identifier within the condominium system and may differ from the door or marketing number. Reconcile it with floor, use, approved project and title record.

Read topic →
Pre-Commitment Freeze — Independent unit number

Pre-Commitment Freeze — Independent unit number

Pre-Commitment Freeze — Independent unit number explains how to freeze the material transaction facts and document versions before a deposit, reservation, signature or other commitment becomes difficult to reverse, how to match evidence to the same asset and decision date, and how to convert a discrepancy into a written condition rather than a vague assurance.

Read topic →
Document Version Reconciliation — Independent unit number

Document Version Reconciliation — Independent unit number

Document Version Reconciliation — Independent unit number — For Document Version Reconciliation — Independent unit number, Start by reconciling “A defensible review ties parcel/block, independent-unit number, ownership share and encumbrances to the exact property before any material payment.” with “TKGM and Web Tapu are primary references for matching the…

Read topic →
Cost Consequence Trace — Independent unit number

Cost Consequence Trace — Independent unit number

Cost Consequence Trace — Independent unit number — Translate each discrepancy into a measurable financial consequence: registration delay, correction cost, revaluation, project amendment, extra fees or possible resale discount. A technical issue becomes an investment decision only when its price, time and liquidity effect is understood.

Read topic →
Resale and Exit Review — Independent unit number

Resale and Exit Review — Independent unit number

Resale and Exit Review — Independent unit number: a practical guide to test how the present legal, technical and financial evidence will affect a later sale, refinancing or buyer due diligence, with emphasis on current evidence, property and party identity, document version, unresolved conflicts and the transaction consequence before commitment.

Read topic →
Cross-Party Consistency Check — Independent unit number

Cross-Party Consistency Check — Independent unit number

Use Cross-Party Consistency Check — Independent unit number to compare the same names, property identifiers, amounts, dates and obligations across every relevant party and document. The guide separates verified facts from assumptions, records the competent source and date, and keeps any unresolved legal, technical, tax, payment or cost issue visible.

Read topic →
Closing-Day Recheck — Independent unit number

Closing-Day Recheck — Independent unit number

Closing-Day Recheck — Independent unit number explains how to repeat the critical checks immediately before completion so stale evidence is not mistaken for current status, how to match evidence to the same asset and decision date, and how to convert a discrepancy into a written condition rather than a vague assurance.

Read topic →
Independent Evidence Replication — Ownership share ratio

Independent Evidence Replication — Ownership share ratio

A decision-focused guide to Independent Evidence Replication — Ownership share ratio: organize the file so an independent reviewer can reproduce the same conclusion without relying on the original adviser’s assertion, preserve the controlling evidence, recheck material changes.

Read topic →
Pre-Commitment Freeze — Ownership share ratio

Pre-Commitment Freeze — Ownership share ratio

Pre-Commitment Freeze — Ownership share ratio — Before a non-refundable deposit or binding signature, freeze a dated reference copy of the data supporting the decision. If closing is delayed or the project/registry changes, use that frozen set as a comparison baseline and recheck.

Read topic →
Document Version Reconciliation — Ownership share ratio

Document Version Reconciliation — Ownership share ratio

Document Version Reconciliation — Ownership share ratio — Reconcile document number, date and referenced page/plan across paper and electronic copies. If two versions were valid at different times, identify which is currently effective and who issued the change; do not mix archive and operative copies.

Read topic →
Cost Consequence Trace — Ownership share ratio

Cost Consequence Trace — Ownership share ratio

Cost Consequence Trace — Ownership share ratio — Translate each discrepancy into a measurable financial consequence: registration delay, correction cost, revaluation, project amendment, extra fees or possible resale discount. A technical issue becomes an investment decision only when its price, time and liquidity effect is understood.

Read topic →
Resale and Exit Review — Ownership share ratio

Resale and Exit Review — Ownership share ratio

Resale and Exit Review — Ownership share ratio explains how to test how the present legal, technical and financial evidence will affect a later sale, refinancing or buyer due diligence, how to match evidence to the same asset and decision date, and how to convert a discrepancy into a written condition rather than a vague assurance.

Read topic →
Cross-Party Consistency Check — Ownership share ratio

Cross-Party Consistency Check — Ownership share ratio

A decision-focused guide to Cross-Party Consistency Check — Ownership share ratio: compare the same names, property identifiers, amounts, dates and obligations across every relevant party and document, preserve the controlling evidence, recheck material changes.

Read topic →
Closing-Day Recheck — Ownership share ratio

Closing-Day Recheck — Ownership share ratio

Closing-Day Recheck — Ownership share ratio — On transfer day, recheck sensitive identifiers from the latest available source; do not assume last week’s verification is still sufficient. Confirm that every promised correction or update is actually reflected before signature and final payment.

Read topic →
Independent Evidence Replication — Condominium ownership status

Independent Evidence Replication — Condominium ownership status

Use Independent Evidence Replication — Condominium ownership status to organize the file so an independent reviewer can reproduce the same conclusion without relying on the original adviser’s assertion. The guide separates verified facts from assumptions, records the competent source and date, and keeps any unresolved legal, technical, tax, payment or cost issue visible.

Read topic →
Pre-Commitment Freeze — Condominium ownership status

Pre-Commitment Freeze — Condominium ownership status

Pre-Commitment Freeze — Condominium ownership status explains how to freeze the material transaction facts and document versions before a deposit, reservation, signature or other commitment becomes difficult to reverse, how to match evidence to the same asset and decision date, and how to convert a discrepancy into a written condition rather than a vague assurance.

Read topic →
Document Version Reconciliation — Condominium ownership status

Document Version Reconciliation — Condominium ownership status

Document Version Reconciliation — Condominium ownership status — Reconcile document number, date and referenced page/plan across paper and electronic copies. If two versions were valid at different times, identify which is currently effective and who issued the change; do not mix archive and operative copies.

Read topic →
Cost Consequence Trace — Condominium ownership status

Cost Consequence Trace — Condominium ownership status

A decision-focused guide to Cost Consequence Trace — Condominium ownership status: trace each issue to a documented cost, responsible payer, timing and effect on price, cash flow or closing funds, preserve the controlling evidence, recheck material changes.

Read topic →
Resale and Exit Review — Condominium ownership status

Resale and Exit Review — Condominium ownership status

Resale and Exit Review — Condominium ownership status: a practical guide to test how the present legal, technical and financial evidence will affect a later sale, refinancing or buyer due diligence, with emphasis on current evidence, property and party identity, document version, unresolved conflicts and the transaction consequence before commitment.

Read topic →
Cross-Party Consistency Check — Condominium ownership status

Cross-Party Consistency Check — Condominium ownership status

Cross-Party Consistency Check — Condominium ownership status — Compare the same identifiers across seller, buyer, agent, bank, valuer and municipality/management where relevant. A mismatch in owner name, block/parcel, independent-unit number or share across party files should stop reliance until the authoritative value is identified.

Read topic →
Closing-Day Recheck — Condominium ownership status

Closing-Day Recheck — Condominium ownership status

Closing-Day Recheck — Condominium ownership status explains how to repeat the critical checks immediately before completion so stale evidence is not mistaken for current status, how to match evidence to the same asset and decision date, and how to convert a discrepancy into a written condition rather than a vague assurance.

Read topic →
Independent Evidence Replication — Construction servitude status

Independent Evidence Replication — Construction servitude status

A decision-focused guide to Independent Evidence Replication — Construction servitude status: organize the file so an independent reviewer can reproduce the same conclusion without relying on the original adviser’s assertion, preserve the controlling evidence, recheck material changes.

Read topic →
Pre-Commitment Freeze — Construction servitude status

Pre-Commitment Freeze — Construction servitude status

Pre-Commitment Freeze — Construction servitude status: a practical guide to freeze the material transaction facts and document versions before a deposit, reservation, signature or other commitment becomes difficult to reverse, with emphasis on current evidence, property and party identity, document version, unresolved conflicts and the transaction consequence before commitment.

Read topic →
Document Version Reconciliation — Construction servitude status

Document Version Reconciliation — Construction servitude status

Document Version Reconciliation — Construction servitude status — Reconcile document number, date and referenced page/plan across paper and electronic copies. If two versions were valid at different times, identify which is currently effective and who issued the change; do not mix archive and operative copies.

Read topic →
Cost Consequence Trace — Construction servitude status

Cost Consequence Trace — Construction servitude status

Use Cost Consequence Trace — Construction servitude status to trace each issue to a documented cost, responsible payer, timing and effect on price, cash flow or closing funds. The guide separates verified facts from assumptions, records the competent source and date, and keeps any unresolved legal, technical, tax, payment or cost issue visible.

Read topic →
Resale and Exit Review — Construction servitude status

Resale and Exit Review — Construction servitude status

Resale and Exit Review — Construction servitude status explains how to test how the present legal, technical and financial evidence will affect a later sale, refinancing or buyer due diligence, how to match evidence to the same asset and decision date, and how to convert a discrepancy into a written condition rather than a vague assurance.

Read topic →
Cross-Party Consistency Check — Construction servitude status

Cross-Party Consistency Check — Construction servitude status

A decision-focused guide to Cross-Party Consistency Check — Construction servitude status: compare the same names, property identifiers, amounts, dates and obligations across every relevant party and document, preserve the controlling evidence, recheck material changes.

Read topic →
Closing-Day Recheck — Construction servitude status

Closing-Day Recheck — Construction servitude status

Closing-Day Recheck — Construction servitude status: a practical guide to repeat the critical checks immediately before completion so stale evidence is not mistaken for current status, with emphasis on current evidence, property and party identity, document version, unresolved conflicts and the transaction consequence before commitment.

Read topic →
Independent Evidence Replication — Title annotations and encumbrances

Independent Evidence Replication — Title annotations and encumbrances

Independent Evidence Replication — Title annotations and encumbrances — Do not rely only on an image supplied by the seller. Re-check the entry or right through the available official channel and compare number, date, scope and authorized party. Independent sourcing reduces the risk of stale or selectively presented evidence.

Read topic →
Pre-Commitment Freeze — Title annotations and encumbrances

Pre-Commitment Freeze — Title annotations and encumbrances

Pre-Commitment Freeze — Title annotations and encumbrances — Start by reconciling “For foreign-buyer transactions, TKGM lists transaction documents including identity information, earthquake insurance for buildings and the foreign-exchange purchase document where applicable.” with “A defensible review ties parcel/block, independent-unit number, ownership…

Read topic →
Document Version Reconciliation — Title annotations and encumbrances

Document Version Reconciliation — Title annotations and encumbrances

Document Version Reconciliation — Title annotations and encumbrances — For Document Version Reconciliation — Title annotations and encumbrances, Start by reconciling “A defensible review ties parcel/block, independent-unit number, ownership share and encumbrances to the exact property before any material payment.” with “TKGM and Web Tapu are primary…

Read topic →
Cost Consequence Trace — Title annotations and encumbrances

Cost Consequence Trace — Title annotations and encumbrances

Cost Consequence Trace — Title annotations and encumbrances — For Cost Consequence Trace — Title annotations and encumbrances, TKGM and Web Tapu are primary references for matching the property, owner and transaction record; due diligence should start from the official registry rather than the advertisement.

Read topic →
Resale and Exit Review — Title annotations and encumbrances

Resale and Exit Review — Title annotations and encumbrances

Resale and Exit Review — Title annotations and encumbrances — Consider how a future buyer or lender will view the same restriction or right. If it requires complex explanation today, it will likely do so at exit; establish a documentation, release or acceptance plan before investing.

Read topic →
Cross-Party Consistency Check — Title annotations and encumbrances

Cross-Party Consistency Check — Title annotations and encumbrances

A decision-focused guide to Cross-Party Consistency Check — Title annotations and encumbrances: compare the same names, property identifiers, amounts, dates and obligations across every relevant party and document, preserve the controlling evidence, recheck material changes.

Read topic →
Closing-Day Recheck — Title annotations and encumbrances

Closing-Day Recheck — Title annotations and encumbrances

Closing-Day Recheck — Title annotations and encumbrances: a practical guide to repeat the critical checks immediately before completion so stale evidence is not mistaken for current status, with emphasis on current evidence, property and party identity, document version, unresolved conflicts and the transaction consequence before commitment.

Read topic →
Independent Evidence Replication — Title transfer fees

Independent Evidence Replication — Title transfer fees

Repeat the key check through an independent official channel before a material financial decision; do not rely only on an image supplied by a party. Separate Tapu Harcı from TKGM revolving-fund charges and other costs; do not rely on an old figure or oral estimate.

Read topic →
Pre-Commitment Freeze — Title transfer fees

Pre-Commitment Freeze — Title transfer fees

Start by reconciling “GİB’s 2026 guidance explains that gains from disposing of certain real property acquired for consideration within five years may fall under capital-gain rules; the published 2026 exemption is TRY 150,000.” with “A strong cost file retains acquisition price, title fees, expenses, invoices and payment dates because they can affect gain calculations, deductions or proof of cost basis.”, then use “Before signing a contract or amendment that changes rights or obligations.” as an independent cross-check if they conflict. The evidence must relate to the same property and transaction period.

Read topic →
Document Version Reconciliation — Title transfer fees

Document Version Reconciliation — Title transfer fees

Reconcile document number, date, pages and annexes with the version used for the decision, and close any version conflict. Separate Tapu Harcı from TKGM revolving-fund charges and other costs; do not rely on an old figure or oral estimate.

Read topic →
Cost Consequence Trace — Title transfer fees

Cost Consequence Trace — Title transfer fees

Translate the verification result into a clear cost consequence—fee, delay, financing risk or correction cost—and include it in the purchase decision. Separate Tapu Harcı from TKGM revolving-fund charges and other costs; do not rely on an old figure or oral estimate.

Read topic →
Resale and Exit Review — Title transfer fees

Resale and Exit Review — Title transfer fees

Review how this document or record will appear to a future buyer or lender on resale, not only whether the current transaction can close. Separate Tapu Harcı from TKGM revolving-fund charges and other costs; do not rely on an old figure or oral estimate.

Read topic →
Cross-Party Consistency Check — Title transfer fees

Cross-Party Consistency Check — Title transfer fees

A decision-focused guide to Cross-Party Consistency Check — Title transfer fees: compare the same names, property identifiers, amounts, dates and obligations across every relevant party and document, preserve the controlling evidence, recheck material changes.

Read topic →
Closing-Day Recheck — Title transfer fees

Closing-Day Recheck — Title transfer fees

Closing-Day Recheck — Title transfer fees: a practical guide to repeat the critical checks immediately before completion so stale evidence is not mistaken for current status, with emphasis on current evidence, property and party identity, document version, unresolved conflicts and the transaction consequence before commitment.

Read topic →
Source Freshness Review — Title deed identity match

Source Freshness Review — Title deed identity match

Source Freshness Review — Title deed identity match: The registered owner’s identity must match the person selling, or a properly authorised representative; a similar name is not enough where identity or authority details differ. The record focuses on Source Freshness Review within Title deed identity match.

Read topic →
Deadline Readiness Review — Title deed identity match

Deadline Readiness Review — Title deed identity match

Deadline Readiness Review — Title deed identity match: The registered owner’s identity must match the person selling, or a properly authorised representative; a similar name is not enough where identity or authority details differ. The record focuses on Deadline Readiness Review within Title deed identity match.

Read topic →
Change Impact Assessment — Title deed identity match

Change Impact Assessment — Title deed identity match

Change Impact Assessment — Title deed identity match: The registered owner’s identity must match the person selling, or a properly authorised representative; a similar name is not enough where identity or authority details differ. The record focuses on Change Impact Assessment within Title deed identity match.

Read topic →
Audit Trail Reconstruction — Title deed identity match

Audit Trail Reconstruction — Title deed identity match

Use Audit Trail Reconstruction — Title deed identity match to rebuild the chronological evidence trail, including what changed, who supplied it and which version became authoritative. The guide separates verified facts from assumptions, records the competent source and date, and keeps any unresolved legal, technical, tax, payment or cost issue visible.

Read topic →
Source Freshness Review — Independent unit number

Source Freshness Review — Independent unit number

Use Source Freshness Review — Independent unit number to confirm that the relied-on rule, registry extract, certificate or other evidence is current enough for the decision date. The guide separates verified facts from assumptions, records the competent source and date, and keeps any unresolved legal, technical, tax, payment or cost issue visible.

Read topic →
Deadline Readiness Review — Independent unit number

Deadline Readiness Review — Independent unit number

A deadline-readiness review for an independent-unit number is a pre-commitment check before reservation, signing, valuation or title transfer to confirm that the title record, approved project, contract and physical premises identify the same unit and that any door, block, floor or use mismatch is resolved before the deadline.

Read topic →
Change Impact Assessment — Independent unit number

Change Impact Assessment — Independent unit number

A change-impact assessment for an independent-unit number identifies what must be reopened when the unit number, project, block, floor, registered use or annexes change, preventing the change from flowing into contracts, valuation, payment and title transfer before its legal, financial and operational effects are understood.

Read topic →
Audit Trail Reconstruction — Independent unit number

Audit Trail Reconstruction — Independent unit number

Audit-trail reconstruction for an independent-unit number rebuilds the evidence chronologically when the unit file is incomplete or conflicting, from the approved project and first registration through later amendments, valuations, contracts and payments, so the current unit identity can be explained from retained primary records.

Read topic →
Source Freshness Review — Ownership share ratio

Source Freshness Review — Ownership share ratio

A source-freshness review for an ownership/land-share ratio confirms that the arsa payı linked to the independent unit comes from registry, project and legal sources current enough for the decision date, and that no later correction or project change has made the older evidence unsafe to rely on.

Read topic →
Deadline Readiness Review — Ownership share ratio

Deadline Readiness Review — Ownership share ratio

A deadline-readiness review for an ownership/land-share ratio confirms that the arsa payı attached to the exact independent unit is documented, reconciled and decision-ready before commitment, and that any open correction, project-change or ratio conflict is resolved before deposit, contract, finance or title transfer.

Read topic →
Change Impact Assessment — Ownership share ratio

Change Impact Assessment — Ownership share ratio

Change Impact Assessment — Ownership share ratio: In paylı mülkiyet (co-ownership by shares), the title-registry regulation shows each co-owner’s share as a fraction, so numerator and denominator matter rather than the general statement “co-owner of the property.” The record focuses on Change Impact Assessment within Ownership share ratio.

Read topic →
Audit Trail Reconstruction — Ownership share ratio

Audit Trail Reconstruction — Ownership share ratio

Audit Trail Reconstruction — Ownership share ratio: In paylı mülkiyet (co-ownership by shares), the title-registry regulation shows each co-owner’s share as a fraction, so numerator and denominator matter rather than the general statement “co-owner of the property.” The record focuses on Audit Trail Reconstruction within Ownership share ratio.

Read topic →
Source Freshness Review — Condominium ownership status

Source Freshness Review — Condominium ownership status

Source Freshness Review — Condominium ownership status: Kat mülkiyeti is condominium ownership of an independent unit in a completed building; the independent-unit number, related arsa payı and registry entry are central. The record focuses on Source Freshness Review within Condominium ownership status.

Read topic →
Deadline Readiness Review — Condominium ownership status

Deadline Readiness Review — Condominium ownership status

Deadline Readiness Review — Condominium ownership status explains how to confirm that required documents, approvals and responsible parties will be ready before the relevant contractual or filing deadline, how to match evidence to the same asset and decision date, and how to convert a discrepancy into a written condition rather than a vague assurance.

Read topic →
Change Impact Assessment — Condominium ownership status

Change Impact Assessment — Condominium ownership status

Change Impact Assessment — Condominium ownership status: Kat mülkiyeti is condominium ownership of an independent unit in a completed building; the independent-unit number, related arsa payı and registry entry are central. The record focuses on Change Impact Assessment within Condominium ownership status.

Read topic →
Audit Trail Reconstruction — Condominium ownership status

Audit Trail Reconstruction — Condominium ownership status

Audit Trail Reconstruction — Condominium ownership status: Kat mülkiyeti is condominium ownership of an independent unit in a completed building; the independent-unit number, related arsa payı and registry entry are central. The record focuses on Audit Trail Reconstruction within Condominium ownership status.

Read topic →
Source Freshness Review — Construction servitude status

Source Freshness Review — Construction servitude status

A decision-focused guide to Source Freshness Review — Construction servitude status: confirm that the relied-on rule, registry extract, certificate or other evidence is current enough for the decision date, preserve the controlling evidence, recheck material changes.

Read topic →
Deadline Readiness Review — Construction servitude status

Deadline Readiness Review — Construction servitude status

Deadline Readiness Review — Construction servitude status: a practical guide to confirm that required documents, approvals and responsible parties will be ready before the relevant contractual or filing deadline, with emphasis on current evidence, property and party identity, document version, unresolved conflicts and the transaction consequence before commitment.

Read topic →
Change Impact Assessment — Construction servitude status

Change Impact Assessment — Construction servitude status

Use Change Impact Assessment — Construction servitude status to treat a material change in party, property, document, amount, use or timing as a trigger to reassess the affected conclusions. The guide separates verified facts from assumptions, records the competent source and date, and keeps any unresolved legal, technical, tax, payment or cost issue visible.

Read topic →
Audit Trail Reconstruction — Construction servitude status

Audit Trail Reconstruction — Construction servitude status

Audit Trail Reconstruction — Construction servitude status: Kat irtifakı is a construction-servitude regime linked to a land share and a planned independent unit during construction or before conversion to kat mülkiyeti; it is not the same as final condominium ownership. The record focuses on Audit Trail Reconstruction within Construction servitude status.

Read topic →
Source Freshness Review — Title annotations and encumbrances

Source Freshness Review — Title annotations and encumbrances

A source-freshness review for title annotations and encumbrances verifies that the relied-on land-registry record is current for the correct parcel and unit, reads each annotation, declaration, easement, mortgage or seizure separately, and refreshes the official evidence at material commitment points instead of relying on an old copy or verbal assurance.

Read topic →
Deadline Readiness Review — Title annotations and encumbrances

Deadline Readiness Review — Title annotations and encumbrances

A deadline-readiness review for title annotations and encumbrances: obtain a fresh registry record, classify each entry, define release or acceptance criteria, and recheck before irreversible payment or transfer.

Read topic →
Change Impact Assessment — Title annotations and encumbrances

Change Impact Assessment — Title annotations and encumbrances

A title-encumbrance change-impact assessment preserves the before record, identifies each added, amended or deleted entry, and reopens price, finance and contract decisions that depended on the old registry.

Read topic →
Audit Trail Reconstruction — Title annotations and encumbrances

Audit Trail Reconstruction — Title annotations and encumbrances

Audit-trail reconstruction rebuilds the chronology behind current title encumbrances, links each mortgage, attachment, easement or annotation to its source, preserves superseded versions and exposes material gaps.

Read topic →
Source Freshness Review — Title transfer fees

Source Freshness Review — Title transfer fees

Source Freshness Review — Title transfer fees: For an ordinary property sale, TKGM states that title fee is charged separately to buyer and seller at 20 per thousand each on the declared sale value, which may not be lower than the relevant property-tax value. The record focuses on Source Freshness Review within Title transfer fees.

Read topic →
Deadline Readiness Review — Title transfer fees

Deadline Readiness Review — Title transfer fees

Deadline Readiness Review — Title transfer fees: For an ordinary property sale, TKGM states that title fee is charged separately to buyer and seller at 20 per thousand each on the declared sale value, which may not be lower than the relevant property-tax value. The record focuses on Deadline Readiness Review within Title transfer fees.

Read topic →
Audit Trail Reconstruction — Title transfer fees

Audit Trail Reconstruction — Title transfer fees

Audit Trail Reconstruction — Title transfer fees: For an ordinary property sale, TKGM states that title fee is charged separately to buyer and seller at 20 per thousand each on the declared sale value, which may not be lower than the relevant property-tax value. The record focuses on Audit Trail Reconstruction within Title transfer fees.

Read topic →
JUANA Intelligent Site AgentKnows JUANA public sections, pages and content
Would you like an advisor to contact you?
The agent searches public site content only. Chat and browsing data may be stored to improve service and connect your request with the sales team. Private admin/client data is never exposed.