Independent Evidence Replication — Condominium ownership status
Core question
Start from the fact that would change the deal if wrong. For “Independent Evidence Replication — Condominium ownership status”, begin with condominium and ownership and make sure both relate to the same asset, party and review date.
Independent check
Check independent independently from the person or document that supplied condominium. If it conflicts with evidence, identify the authoritative owner of the fact and obtain a fresh record.
Failure scenario
Failure example: condominium looks correct, but replication belongs to a different date, unit or transaction. Keep the issue open and record whether it affects price, payment, use, finance, possession or registration.
- condominium
- source
- replication
- ownership
- official
- date
Required evidence
Build the evidence set around condominium, ownership, independent, evidence, replication and official. Mark each as verified, conflicting, stale or unavailable.
- replication
- date
- source
- official
- ownership
- condominium
Decision rule
Practical cure
Audit trail
Record-specific evidence matrix
| Item | Cross-check | Status |
|---|---|---|
| date | independent | Open / Verified |
| condominium | ownership | Open / Verified |
| evidence | official | Open / Verified |
Official sources
Practical FAQ built from the record’s verified facts
What official fact about condominium ownership (Kat Mülkiyeti) should a buyer verify during an independent verification?
Kat Mülkiyeti records condominium ownership for an independent unit and should be reconciled with unit number, type, land share and project—not merely the complex name or door number. Do not rely only on a screenshot or seller-provided file. Reproduce the result from Web Tapu, TKGM or the official registry/plan available to the authorised party, then compare both results. Independent replication reduces stale or altered-document risk.
Which document fields or legal details on condominium ownership (Kat Mülkiyeti) matter most during an independent verification?
What can go wrong with condominium ownership (Kat Mülkiyeti) during an independent verification, and what evidence resolves it?
TKGM rules govern establishment of condominium ownership and its link to projects and independent units, while condominium registers have increasingly moved to electronic workflows. Do not rely only on a screenshot or seller-provided file. Reproduce the result from Web Tapu, TKGM or the official registry/plan available to the authorised party, then compare both results. Independent replication reduces stale or altered-document risk.
Sources for this section were reviewed on 16 August 2026.
- TKGM — Kat İrtifakı ve Kat Mülkiyeti Genelgesi
- TKGM — Kat Mülkiyeti Kütüklerine Fiziki Tescilin Kaldırılması
- TKGM — Tapu Sicili Uygulamaları
Independent evidence replication
Evidence and decision plan for Independent Evidence Replication — Condominium ownership status
“Independent Evidence Replication — Condominium ownership status” should be handled as a decision file, not as a collection of documents. Its working objective is to organize the file so an independent reviewer can reproduce the same conclusion without relying on the original adviser’s assertion. Evidence is useful only when it can be tied to the same property, party and decision date.
Evidence to assemble
- For “Independent Evidence Replication — Condominium ownership status”, match the property and party identifiers in the evidence to the asset and people actually involved; a correct document for the wrong unit or person does not close the check.
- For “Independent Evidence Replication — Condominium ownership status”, record issuer, source, issue or retrieval date and version where available, then distinguish an original/current record from a scan, translation, draft, expired copy or superseded version.
- For “Independent Evidence Replication — Condominium ownership status”, compare documentary status with the physical, payment or operational reality relevant to the topic and write down every unexplained difference before commitment.
- For “Independent Evidence Replication — Condominium ownership status”, convert each unresolved difference into a named condition: evidence required, person responsible, deadline and the consequence if the condition is not satisfied.
Official reference to recheck
The source register for “Independent Evidence Replication — Condominium ownership status” includes Ministry of Justice — Condominium Ownership Law No. 634 (https://mevzuat.adalet.gov.tr/mevzuat/103807?query=Madde+4). Use that source for the matters within its authority and recheck it when timing or rules are material; it does not replace a registry, engineering, tax, banking or contractual record that the specific decision separately requires.
Decision boundary
The decision for “Independent Evidence Replication — Condominium ownership status” is not “document present / document absent.” It is whether the evidence is current, identifies the right asset and parties, resolves material conflicts and supports the next irreversible step.
Independently reproducing condominium-ownership status
If a unit is described as registered under kat mülkiyeti, reproduce that fact from the title record or TKGM evidence rather than relying on project marketing. The status should be tied to the exact independent unit, not merely to the building as a general concept. Distinguish kat mülkiyeti from kat irtifakı because they represent different registered legal states.
Preserve the retrieved evidence and verification date, then compare it with the contract and any valuation. If marketing says only that the unit has a “ready title,” do not convert that phrase into a legal conclusion until the controlling registry entry has been reviewed.