Resale and Exit Review

A practical Resale and Exit Review workflow for Ownership share ratio, focused on evidence, timing, record reconciliation, exception closure and an auditable decision.

Verified facts relevant to this topic

Purpose of this guide

Resale and Exit Review — Ownership share ratio applies an operational verification workflow to Ownership share ratio. The specific objective is to test whether the current point could impair future resale, financing, transferability or the breadth of the buyer pool. A fact should not be treated as operationally reliable merely because it exists; it must be tied to the correct property, party and date and supported by evidence that another reviewer can audit later.

When to use this review

Before signing a contract or amendment that changes rights or obligations.
Before sending money or changing a beneficiary or account.
When a new version of a previously relied-on document arrives.
When there is a restriction, unusual feature or reliance on a narrow specialist buyer group.
When the database and a primary document or official source disagree.
Before final closing when the information can change over time.

Retrievable documentation

Financial and operational impact

Verified facts from official sources

Practical FAQ built from the record’s verified facts

What official fact about land share (Arsa Payı) should a buyer verify before resale or exit?

Arsa Payı is the independent unit’s share in the land/common ownership and must be read together with the unit, project and registry; it is not a stand-alone investment percentage and does not automatically equal the unit’s internal-area ratio. Ask how a future buyer, bank or valuer will read the same data at exit. If an item already needs lengthy explanation, document the correction or resolution before purchase instead of exporting the problem to the next sale.

Which document fields or legal details on land share (Arsa Payı) matter most before resale or exit?

Ask how a future buyer, bank or valuer will read the same data at exit. If an item already needs lengthy explanation, document the correction or resolution before purchase instead of exporting the problem to the next sale. Arsa Payı is the independent unit’s share in the land/common ownership and must be read together with the unit, project and registry; it is not a stand-alone investment percentage and does not automatically equal the unit’s internal-area ratio. TKGM condominium guidance treats land-share allocation as part of establishing independent units, and TKGM also publishes procedures/decisions concerning correction or amendment of shares.

What can go wrong with land share (Arsa Payı) before resale or exit, and what evidence resolves it?

TKGM condominium guidance treats land-share allocation as part of establishing independent units, and TKGM also publishes procedures/decisions concerning correction or amendment of shares. Ask how a future buyer, bank or valuer will read the same data at exit. If an item already needs lengthy explanation, document the correction or resolution before purchase instead of exporting the problem to the next sale.

Sources for this section were reviewed on 16 August 2026.

Evidence and decision plan for Resale and Exit Review — Ownership share ratio

The due-diligence purpose of “Resale and Exit Review — Ownership share ratio” is to test how the present legal, technical and financial evidence will affect a later sale, refinancing or buyer due diligence. A reviewer should be able to trace every material conclusion to a current source and identify any assumption that has not yet become evidence.

Evidence to assemble

For “Resale and Exit Review — Ownership share ratio”, match the property and party identifiers in the evidence to the asset and people actually involved; a correct document for the wrong unit or person does not close the check.
For “Resale and Exit Review — Ownership share ratio”, record issuer, source, issue or retrieval date and version where available, then distinguish an original/current record from a scan, translation, draft, expired copy or superseded version.
For “Resale and Exit Review — Ownership share ratio”, compare documentary status with the physical, payment or operational reality relevant to the topic and write down every unexplained difference before commitment.
For “Resale and Exit Review — Ownership share ratio”, convert each unresolved difference into a named condition: evidence required, person responsible, deadline and the consequence if the condition is not satisfied.

Official reference to recheck

The source register for “Resale and Exit Review — Ownership share ratio” includes TKGM — Tapu ve Kadastro Genel Müdürlüğü (https://www.tkgm.gov.tr/anasayfa). Use that source for the matters within its authority and recheck it when timing or rules are material; it does not replace a registry, engineering, tax, banking or contractual record that the specific decision separately requires.

Decision boundary

For “Resale and Exit Review — Ownership share ratio”, a residual issue should remain open whenever its legal, technical, tax, payment or cost consequence cannot yet be measured. The file is ready only when that issue is closed or consciously accepted by the appropriate decision-maker.

Reviewing the ownership share for resale and exit

At exit, a buyer or lender may compare the registered share with the unit, its appurtenances and, in some contexts, the allocation of common costs. Prepare a file showing the current fraction and any historical change, with the document that authorised or recorded that change. Do not rely on a percentage reproduced in an old valuation.

If the historic contract and current register show different shares, explain the chronology with official evidence before marketing. A documented explanation prevents an old discrepancy from turning into doubt about unit identity or rights during resale.

Resale and Exit Review — Ownership share ratio