Cross-Party Consistency Check — Independent unit number
Core question
Start from the fact that would change the deal if wrong. For “Cross-Party Consistency Check — Independent unit number”, begin with independent and unit and make sure both relate to the same asset, party and review date.
Required evidence
Build the evidence set around independent, unit, number, cross, party and consistency. Mark each as verified, conflicting, stale or unavailable.
- unit
- official
- source
- number
- consistency
- independent
Practical cure
Independent check
Check number independently from the person or document that supplied independent. If it conflicts with cross, identify the authoritative owner of the fact and obtain a fresh record.
Failure scenario
Failure example: independent looks correct, but party belongs to a different date, unit or transaction. Keep the issue open and record whether it affects price, payment, use, finance, possession or registration.
- party
- source
- official
- number
- unit
- cross
Decision rule
Audit trail
Record-specific evidence matrix
| Item | Cross-check | Status |
|---|---|---|
| cross | number | Open / Verified |
| source | consistency | Open / Verified |
| independent | official | Open / Verified |
Official sources
Practical FAQ built from the record’s verified facts
What official fact about independent-unit number should a buyer verify when seller, bank and other parties disagree?
The independent-unit number is a legal identifier within the condominium system and may differ from the door or marketing number. Reconcile it with floor, use, approved project and title record. Compare the same identifiers across seller, buyer, agent, bank, valuer and municipality/management where relevant. A mismatch in owner name, block/parcel, independent-unit number or share across party files should stop reliance until the authoritative value is identified.
Which document fields or legal details on independent-unit number matter most when seller, bank and other parties disagree?
Compare the same identifiers across seller, buyer, agent, bank, valuer and municipality/management where relevant. A mismatch in owner name, block/parcel, independent-unit number or share across party files should stop reliance until the authoritative value is identified. The independent-unit number is a legal identifier within the condominium system and may differ from the door or marketing number. Reconcile it with floor, use, approved project and title record. TKGM condominium/construction-servitude materials show independent units being created and linked to the project and land shares, so the unit must be checked within that structure rather than as an isolated number.
What can go wrong with independent-unit number when seller, bank and other parties disagree, and what evidence resolves it?
TKGM condominium/construction-servitude materials show independent units being created and linked to the project and land shares, so the unit must be checked within that structure rather than as an isolated number. Compare the same identifiers across seller, buyer, agent, bank, valuer and municipality/management where relevant. A mismatch in owner name, block/parcel, independent-unit number or share across party files should stop reliance until the authoritative value is identified.
Sources for this section were reviewed on 16 August 2026.
- TKGM — Kat İrtifakı ve Kat Mülkiyeti Genelge 2021/4
- TKGM — Kat İrtifakı Tesisi
- TKGM — Kat Mülkiyeti Tesisi
Cross-party consistency check
Evidence and decision plan for Cross-Party Consistency Check — Independent unit number
“Cross-Party Consistency Check — Independent unit number” should be handled as a decision file, not as a collection of documents. Its working objective is to compare the same names, property identifiers, amounts, dates and obligations across every relevant party and document. Evidence is useful only when it can be tied to the same property, party and decision date.
Evidence to assemble
- For “Cross-Party Consistency Check — Independent unit number”, match the property and party identifiers in the evidence to the asset and people actually involved; a correct document for the wrong unit or person does not close the check.
- For “Cross-Party Consistency Check — Independent unit number”, record issuer, source, issue or retrieval date and version where available, then distinguish an original/current record from a scan, translation, draft, expired copy or superseded version.
- For “Cross-Party Consistency Check — Independent unit number”, compare documentary status with the physical, payment or operational reality relevant to the topic and write down every unexplained difference before commitment.
- For “Cross-Party Consistency Check — Independent unit number”, convert each unresolved difference into a named condition: evidence required, person responsible, deadline and the consequence if the condition is not satisfied.
Official reference to recheck
The source register for “Cross-Party Consistency Check — Independent unit number” includes TKGM — Tapu ve Kadastro Genel Müdürlüğü (https://www.tkgm.gov.tr/anasayfa). Use that source for the matters within its authority and recheck it when timing or rules are material; it does not replace a registry, engineering, tax, banking or contractual record that the specific decision separately requires.
Decision boundary
The decision for “Cross-Party Consistency Check — Independent unit number” is not “document present / document absent.” It is whether the evidence is current, identifies the right asset and parties, resolves material conflicts and supports the next irreversible step.
Comparing the independent-unit number across all parties
Compare the identifier used by seller, buyer, developer, valuer, bank and legal adviser where applicable. Do not look only for identical text: one party may use a block/unit marketing code while the official record uses the independent-unit number. The task is to prove that every label points to the same legal asset.
Any unexplained difference is an exception before further signature or payment. Extend the check to appurtenances described with the unit because a matching apartment number combined with a different storage room or parking space can still make the transaction inconsistent. Record the source of each label and how it was mapped to the legal identity.