Source Freshness Review — Construction servitude status

Source Freshness Review — Construction servitude status

Core question

Practical cure

Failure scenario

• source
• construction
• freshness
• official
• source
• servitude

Required evidence

Build the evidence set around construction, servitude, source, freshness, official and source. Mark each as verified, conflicting, stale or unavailable.

• servitude
• identity
• date
• construction
• freshness
• official

Decision rule

Independent check

Audit trail

Record-specific evidence matrix

Official sources

• TKGM — Web Tapu
• TKGM — FAQ
• TKGM — Parcel Query

Expanded source-backed knowledge file

What the record proves

Required reconciliation

Use the newest available official record or circular because the status may change.

Limits and exceptions

Account for TKGM''s official 2 July 2026 update and current digital/document requirements when establishing or converting rights.

Decision consequence

2026 update

FAQ

How recent should the evidence for Kat İrtifakı under current TKGM guidance be before signing?

TKGM published an amendment on 2 July 2026 to Circular 2021/4 on Kat İrtifakı and Kat Mülkiyeti, so review should use the current instruction rather than an older saved copy. Confirm construction servitude is registered for the correct unit and project, including unit number, land share and use. Do not treat it as automatically equivalent to Kat Mülkiyeti. Use the newest available official record or circular because the status may change. This record applies that evidence specifically to Kat İrtifakı under current TKGM guidance, and should be reconciled to the exact property rather than generalized from another unit.

Which part can change between reservation and closing — Kat İrtifakı under current TKGM guidance?

Use the newest available official record or circular because the status may change. Account for TKGM''s official 2 July 2026 update and current digital/document requirements when establishing or converting rights. For Kat İrtifakı under current TKGM guidance, preserve the current official record, its date and the identifiers used to reach the conclusion.

What should be rechecked on transfer day — Kat İrtifakı under current TKGM guidance?

Account for TKGM''s official 2 July 2026 update and current digital/document requirements when establishing or converting rights. Preserve the result, date, source and any remaining condition in the transaction file. For Kat İrtifakı under current TKGM guidance, an unresolved conflict remains a transaction condition until the competent record or authority resolves it.

Primary sources

• TKGM — 2021/4 Kat İrtifakı ve Kat Mülkiyeti Genelgesi
• TKGM — 2026 update to 2021/4
• TKGM — 3D digital building model requirement

Kat İrtifakı verification

Use the newest available official record or circular because the status may change.

Account for TKGM's official 2 July 2026 update and current digital/document requirements when establishing or converting rights.

Evidence and decision plan for Source Freshness Review — Construction servitude status

When reviewing “Source Freshness Review — Construction servitude status”, the file should confirm that the relied-on rule, registry extract, certificate or other evidence is current enough for the decision date. This makes the article useful at the point of commitment because unresolved facts are separated from verified facts instead of being buried in narrative.

Evidence to assemble

• For “Source Freshness Review — Construction servitude status”, match the property and party identifiers in the evidence to the asset and people actually involved; a correct document for the wrong unit or person does not close the check.
• For “Source Freshness Review — Construction servitude status”, record issuer, source, issue or retrieval date and version where available, then distinguish an original/current record from a scan, translation, draft, expired copy or superseded version.
• For “Source Freshness Review — Construction servitude status”, compare documentary status with the physical, payment or operational reality relevant to the topic and write down every unexplained difference before commitment.
• For “Source Freshness Review — Construction servitude status”, convert each unresolved difference into a named condition: evidence required, person responsible, deadline and the consequence if the condition is not satisfied.

Official reference to recheck

The source register for “Source Freshness Review — Construction servitude status” includes TKGM — Tapu ve Kadastro Genel Müdürlüğü (https://www.tkgm.gov.tr/anasayfa). Use that source for the matters within its authority and recheck it when timing or rules are material; it does not replace a registry, engineering, tax, banking or contractual record that the specific decision separately requires.

Decision boundary

A defensible conclusion on “Source Freshness Review — Construction servitude status” records both what was verified and the limits of that verification. If a missing fact could change ownership, legality, safety, cost or payment security, it should block the related commitment until resolved.