Deadline Readiness Review — Construction servitude status
Core question
Work backward from closing and payment. For “Deadline Readiness Review — Construction servitude status”, begin with construction and servitude and make sure both relate to the same asset, party and review date.
Independent check
Check deadline independently from the person or document that supplied construction. If it conflicts with readiness, identify the authoritative owner of the fact and obtain a fresh record.
Failure scenario
- source
- servitude
- readiness
- date
- construction
- identity
Decision rule
Practical cure
Required evidence
Build the evidence set around construction, servitude, deadline, readiness, official and source. Mark each as verified, conflicting, stale or unavailable.
- readiness
- deadline
- official
- construction
- date
- servitude
Audit trail
Record-specific evidence matrix
| Item | Cross-check | Status |
|---|---|---|
| source | date | Open / Verified |
| identity | readiness | Open / Verified |
| servitude | deadline | Open / Verified |
Official sources
Expanded source-backed knowledge file
What the record proves
Required reconciliation
Before the deadline, ensure missing evidence can be obtained without time pressure undermining due diligence.
Limits and exceptions
Account for TKGM''s official 2 July 2026 update and current digital/document requirements when establishing or converting rights.
Decision consequence
2026 update
FAQ
How can Kat İrtifakı under current TKGM guidance affect the legal ability to use the property?
TKGM published an amendment on 2 July 2026 to Circular 2021/4 on Kat İrtifakı and Kat Mülkiyeti, so review should use the current instruction rather than an older saved copy. Confirm construction servitude is registered for the correct unit and project, including unit number, land share and use. Do not treat it as automatically equivalent to Kat Mülkiyeti. Before the deadline, ensure missing evidence can be obtained without time pressure undermining due diligence. This record applies that evidence specifically to Kat İrtifakı under current TKGM guidance, and should be reconciled to the exact property rather than generalized from another unit.
Which authority or document controls the answer — Kat İrtifakı under current TKGM guidance?
Before the deadline, ensure missing evidence can be obtained without time pressure undermining due diligence. Account for TKGM''s official 2 July 2026 update and current digital/document requirements when establishing or converting rights. For Kat İrtifakı under current TKGM guidance, preserve the current official record, its date and the identifiers used to reach the conclusion.
What should not be inferred from marketing material — Kat İrtifakı under current TKGM guidance?
Account for TKGM''s official 2 July 2026 update and current digital/document requirements when establishing or converting rights. Preserve the result, date, source and any remaining condition in the transaction file. For Kat İrtifakı under current TKGM guidance, an unresolved conflict remains a transaction condition until the competent record or authority resolves it.
Primary sources
- TKGM — 2021/4 Kat İrtifakı ve Kat Mülkiyeti Genelgesi
- TKGM — 2026 update to 2021/4
- TKGM — 3D digital building model requirement
Kat İrtifakı verification
Before the deadline, ensure missing evidence can be obtained without time pressure undermining due diligence.
Account for TKGM's official 2 July 2026 update and current digital/document requirements when establishing or converting rights.
Evidence and decision plan for Deadline Readiness Review — Construction servitude status
For “Deadline Readiness Review — Construction servitude status”, the practical objective is to confirm that required documents, approvals and responsible parties will be ready before the relevant contractual or filing deadline. The review should distinguish what is proved now, what still depends on a missing or stale document, and what difference that gap makes to price, signing, payment, handover or later resale.
Evidence to assemble
- For “Deadline Readiness Review — Construction servitude status”, match the property and party identifiers in the evidence to the asset and people actually involved; a correct document for the wrong unit or person does not close the check.
- For “Deadline Readiness Review — Construction servitude status”, record issuer, source, issue or retrieval date and version where available, then distinguish an original/current record from a scan, translation, draft, expired copy or superseded version.
- For “Deadline Readiness Review — Construction servitude status”, compare documentary status with the physical, payment or operational reality relevant to the topic and write down every unexplained difference before commitment.
- For “Deadline Readiness Review — Construction servitude status”, convert each unresolved difference into a named condition: evidence required, person responsible, deadline and the consequence if the condition is not satisfied.
Official reference to recheck
The source register for “Deadline Readiness Review — Construction servitude status” includes TKGM — Tapu ve Kadastro Genel Müdürlüğü (https://www.tkgm.gov.tr/anasayfa). Use that source for the matters within its authority and recheck it when timing or rules are material; it does not replace a registry, engineering, tax, banking or contractual record that the specific decision separately requires.
Decision boundary
Close “Deadline Readiness Review — Construction servitude status” only when the conclusion can be reproduced from evidence by another reviewer. A reasonable outcome may be proceed, proceed subject to a written condition, reprice, obtain specialist advice, or stop; uncertainty should remain visible instead of being converted into a positive statement.