Exception Register — Construction servitude status
Core question
Make the conclusion reproducible by another reviewer. For “Exception Register — Construction servitude status”, begin with construction and servitude and make sure both relate to the same asset, party and review date.
Independent check
Check exception independently from the person or document that supplied construction. If it conflicts with register, identify the authoritative owner of the fact and obtain a fresh record.
Practical cure
Required evidence
Build the evidence set around construction, servitude, exception, register, official and source. Mark each as verified, conflicting, stale or unavailable.
- register
- date
- official
- construction
- source
- identity
Failure scenario
Failure example: construction looks correct, but official belongs to a different date, unit or transaction. Keep the issue open and record whether it affects price, payment, use, finance, possession or registration.
- source
- exception
- register
- official
- identity
- construction
Decision rule
Audit trail
Record-specific evidence matrix
| Item | Cross-check | Status |
|---|---|---|
| source | construction | Open / Verified |
| exception | identity | Open / Verified |
| register | date | Open / Verified |
Official sources
Practical FAQ built from the record’s verified facts
What official fact about construction servitude (Kat İrtifakı) should a buyer verify when a mismatch or exception appears?
Kat İrtifakı is a construction-servitude regime linked to a project and future/under-construction independent units; it is not automatically equivalent to Kat Mülkiyeti. Log every mismatch or missing item as a separate exception: the field involved, the conflicting document, the authority responsible for correction and the condition that blocks closing until resolution. Do not leave exceptions as oral notes.
Which document fields or legal details on construction servitude (Kat İrtifakı) matter most when a mismatch or exception appears?
Log every mismatch or missing item as a separate exception: the field involved, the conflicting document, the authority responsible for correction and the condition that blocks closing until resolution. Do not leave exceptions as oral notes. Kat İrtifakı is a construction-servitude regime linked to a project and future/under-construction independent units; it is not automatically equivalent to Kat Mülkiyeti. TKGM guidance links this status to architectural projects, units and land shares; since the nationwide 3D-building-model rollout in 2025, digital model consistency has become increasingly important.
What can go wrong with construction servitude (Kat İrtifakı) when a mismatch or exception appears, and what evidence resolves it?
TKGM guidance links this status to architectural projects, units and land shares; since the nationwide 3D-building-model rollout in 2025, digital model consistency has become increasingly important. Log every mismatch or missing item as a separate exception: the field involved, the conflicting document, the authority responsible for correction and the condition that blocks closing until resolution. Do not leave exceptions as oral notes.
Sources for this section were reviewed on 16 August 2026.
- TKGM — Kat İrtifakı ve Kat Mülkiyeti Genelgesi
- TKGM — 3D Building Model Project
- TKGM — Hatay 3B Kadastro Bilgilendirme
Exception register
Exceptions in construction-servitude status
Register cases where the unit, approved project or permit does not reconcile with the entry, or where closing depends on a conversion that is not complete. For each exception identify the evidence needed to close it and the effect of remaining in Kat İrtifakı on use, financing or resale.