Counterparty Confirmation — Construction servitude status

Use Counterparty Confirmation — Construction servitude status to obtain independent confirmation of material facts from the responsible party or issuer instead of relying on a forwarded copy alone. The guide separates verified facts from assumptions, records the competent source and date, and keeps any unresolved legal, technical, tax, payment or cost issue visible.

Counterparty Confirmation — Construction servitude status

A practical Counterparty Confirmation workflow for Construction servitude status, focused on evidence, timing, record reconciliation, exception closure and an auditable decision.

Verified facts relevant to this topic

Purpose of this guide

Counterparty Confirmation — Construction servitude status applies an operational verification workflow to Construction servitude status. The specific objective is to match counterparty statements to the register, contract and a verified communication channel before accepting any material change. A fact should not be treated as operationally reliable merely because it exists; it must be tied to the correct property, party and date and supported by evidence that another reviewer can audit later.

When to use this review

Before signing a contract or amendment that changes rights or obligations.
Before sending money or changing a beneficiary or account.
When a new version of a previously relied-on document arrives.
When there is a change of account, representative, instruction or document.
When the database and a primary document or official source disagree.
Before final closing when the information can change over time.

Evidence file

Retain the source or document actually used for the decision.
Record retrieval/receipt date and reviewer identity.
Link the version to the correct property, unit and counterparty.
Preserve prior versions when a document changes.
Record any difference between the database and primary evidence.
Do not fill missing fields with undocumented estimates.

Consistency tests

Does every item refer to the same property and unit?
Are party identities and legal capacities consistent?
Is the date suitable for the moment on which the decision relies?
Are amounts, rights and restrictions consistent across records?
Does a material fact appear in only one source without explanation?
Has anything changed since the last review that could alter the decision?

Verified facts from official sources

Counterparty confirmation of construction servitude

Ask the seller to state the registered status, unit number, land share and whether any conversion or amendment is pending. Then verify those statements independently. The seller’s confirmation is useful for exposing inconsistencies, but it is not the final source of proof.

Counterparty confirmation for a Kat İrtifakı unit

A useful seller confirmation should identify the exact independent unit rather than merely say that the project has Kat İrtifakı. Ask the seller or developer to state the ada/parsel, block and independent-unit number, registered land share, title status, approved-project reference and whether any correction or conversion application is pending. If the building is already occupied, obtain a separate statement about the occupancy-permit position and the reason why the unit remains under Kat İrtifakı if Kat Mülkiyeti has not yet been established.

Then reconcile each statement with the source that has authority over it. TKGM evidence governs the registered property right; the competent municipality or other authority governs permits and approved construction records. A developer brochure, management-company letter or sales representative’s message may explain the seller’s position, but it cannot cure a different independent-unit number, land share or project designation in the official records.

Record unresolved discrepancies in writing before contract signature. If the seller promises a future correction, identify the responsible applicant, the exact official result required and the contractual consequence if it does not occur. Keep the dated confirmation in the transaction file so a later reviewer can distinguish a new post-contract change from a representation that was already inaccurate when the buyer committed.

Frequently asked questions

What should the seller or developer confirm about a Kat İrtifakı unit before the buyer relies on the project description?

Ask for a written confirmation identifying the land parcel, independent-unit number, land share, approved architectural project and the present title status. If the building is completed, the seller should also explain the current occupancy and condominium-ownership conversion position. The confirmation is useful for fixing the seller’s representation, but every material field should still be reconciled with current TKGM and competent municipal records.

Is a developer’s statement that “Kat Mülkiyeti will be issued soon” enough to close the title-status review?

No. A future conversion promise is different from the right registered today. The buyer should identify what remains outstanding, who is responsible for the application, whether the building and approved project satisfy the relevant requirements, and what evidence will prove completion. Until the register changes, the file should continue to describe the unit by its actual registered status.

How should a mismatch between the seller’s unit description and the registered Kat İrtifakı data be handled?

Record the exact mismatch—unit number, floor, block, land share, project designation or parcel—and require the seller to explain it with verifiable documents. Compare the explanation with the approved project and current land-register information. Do not cure a material mismatch by changing only the sales brochure or contract wording; the evidence governing the property itself must be reconciled.

Counterparty Confirmation — Construction servitude status