Pre-Commitment Freeze

A practical Pre-Commitment Freeze workflow for Construction servitude status, focused on evidence, timing, record reconciliation, exception closure and an auditable decision.

Verified facts relevant to this topic

Purpose of this guide

Pre-Commitment Freeze — Construction servitude status applies an operational verification workflow to Construction servitude status. The specific objective is to freeze an approved version of critical documents and data before signing or payment so the decision basis cannot change silently. A fact should not be treated as operationally reliable merely because it exists; it must be tied to the correct property, party and date and supported by evidence that another reviewer can audit later.

When to use this review

Before signing a contract or amendment that changes rights or obligations.
Before sending money or changing a beneficiary or account.
When a new version of a previously relied-on document arrives.
When there is a new version or amendment arriving after approval.
When the database and a primary document or official source disagree.
Before final closing when the information can change over time.

Starting point

Define the exact question, the pass criterion and the source that must prove the answer. Separate primary evidence, copied records, professional interpretation and sales statements. The anchor record for this review is the frozen pre-commitment package.

Execution sequence

Define the critical point and pass criterion.
Retrieve the current source or request the primary document.
Cross-check names, identifiers, dates, amounts and rights.
Log every conflict or gap explicitly.
Assign an owner and closure date to each open point.
Turn unresolved material points into written pre-commitment conditions.
Recheck changeable information at the actual decision moment.
Archive the pass, conditional-pass or stop decision with its reason.

Verified facts from official sources

Practical FAQ built from the record’s verified facts

What official fact about construction servitude (Kat İrtifakı) should a buyer verify before a non-refundable commitment?

Kat İrtifakı is a construction-servitude regime linked to a project and future/under-construction independent units; it is not automatically equivalent to Kat Mülkiyeti. Before a non-refundable deposit or binding signature, freeze a dated reference copy of the data supporting the decision. If closing is delayed or the project/registry changes, use that frozen set as a comparison baseline and recheck.

Which document fields or legal details on construction servitude (Kat İrtifakı) matter most before a non-refundable commitment?

Before a non-refundable deposit or binding signature, freeze a dated reference copy of the data supporting the decision. If closing is delayed or the project/registry changes, use that frozen set as a comparison baseline and recheck. Kat İrtifakı is a construction-servitude regime linked to a project and future/under-construction independent units; it is not automatically equivalent to Kat Mülkiyeti. TKGM guidance links this status to architectural projects, units and land shares; since the nationwide 3D-building-model rollout in 2025, digital model consistency has become increasingly important.

What can go wrong with construction servitude (Kat İrtifakı) before a non-refundable commitment, and what evidence resolves it?

TKGM guidance links this status to architectural projects, units and land shares; since the nationwide 3D-building-model rollout in 2025, digital model consistency has become increasingly important. Before a non-refundable deposit or binding signature, freeze a dated reference copy of the data supporting the decision. If closing is delayed or the project/registry changes, use that frozen set as a comparison baseline and recheck.

Sources for this section were reviewed on 16 August 2026.

Evidence and decision plan for Pre-Commitment Freeze — Construction servitude status

For “Pre-Commitment Freeze — Construction servitude status”, the practical objective is to freeze the material transaction facts and document versions before a deposit, reservation, signature or other commitment becomes difficult to reverse. The review should distinguish what is proved now, what still depends on a missing or stale document, and what difference that gap makes to price, signing, payment, handover or later resale.

Evidence to assemble

For “Pre-Commitment Freeze — Construction servitude status”, match the property and party identifiers in the evidence to the asset and people actually involved; a correct document for the wrong unit or person does not close the check.
For “Pre-Commitment Freeze — Construction servitude status”, record issuer, source, issue or retrieval date and version where available, then distinguish an original/current record from a scan, translation, draft, expired copy or superseded version.
For “Pre-Commitment Freeze — Construction servitude status”, compare documentary status with the physical, payment or operational reality relevant to the topic and write down every unexplained difference before commitment.
For “Pre-Commitment Freeze — Construction servitude status”, convert each unresolved difference into a named condition: evidence required, person responsible, deadline and the consequence if the condition is not satisfied.

Official reference to recheck

The source register for “Pre-Commitment Freeze — Construction servitude status” includes TKGM — Tapu ve Kadastro Genel Müdürlüğü (https://www.tkgm.gov.tr/anasayfa). Use that source for the matters within its authority and recheck it when timing or rules are material; it does not replace a registry, engineering, tax, banking or contractual record that the specific decision separately requires.

Decision boundary

Close “Pre-Commitment Freeze — Construction servitude status” only when the conclusion can be reproduced from evidence by another reviewer. A reasonable outcome may be proceed, proceed subject to a written condition, reprice, obtain specialist advice, or stop; uncertainty should remain visible instead of being converted into a positive statement.

Freezing construction-servitude status before commitment

Before non-refundable money is paid, preserve dated registry evidence showing the kat irtifakı status, relevant independent unit and share. The contract should describe the present registration as it exists, not as the developer expects it to become later. If conversion to condominium ownership is a purchase condition, define how and when that condition will be evidenced.

Any post-freeze change to the project, unit number or share requires a fresh review. This prevents the payment schedule from continuing automatically after the legal asset on which the buyer’s decision was based has materially changed.

Pre-Commitment Freeze — Construction servitude status