Buyer Questions for Construction servitude status
Ask the developer/seller: What is the project unit number? Has conversion to Kat Mülkiyeti been filed? Has the occupancy permit been issued? Are amendments or non-compliances delaying conversion? Kat İrtifakı construction servitude status: Kat İrtifakı is a project-linked legal status before full condominium ownership; the approved project, permit and occupancy status therefore need separate checking rather than treating it as automatically equivalent to Kat Mülkiyeti.
Required evidence
Failure scenario
A Kat İrtifakı record should be treated cautiously if the underlying construction or registry evidence is dated, unrelated, or inconsistent with the actual unit. Ask which official record proves the current status and when it was retrieved.
Independent check
A common failure pattern is that Kat Mülkiyeti appears correct while building record is missing, stale or linked to another record.
Individual dossier for Condominium ownership status Verification Guide
Test ownership independently before using condominium as supporting evidence.
Which official record is the primary evidence for Kat Mülkiyeti condominium ownership?
If Kat İrtifakı exists but conversion to Kat Mülkiyeti cannot be confirmed, ask what remains outstanding: occupancy approval, registry conversion, project completion, or another formal step. Do not assume the status will change automatically.
A common failure pattern is that Kat İrtifakı appears correct while conversion status is missing, stale or linked to another record.
Before closing, distinguish what is already registered from what is still expected. A buyer should know whether the purchase is of an existing servitude right or a completed condominium title and what evidence supports that conclusion.
The review must connect construction with servitude using evidence from the same asset and the same decision date.
Test servitude independently before using construction as supporting evidence.
Where conversion status is unclear, request the current registry and building or occupancy evidence and make any required conversion or correction a documented condition rather than relying on a sales assurance.
Buyer questions that expose the real meaning of Kat İrtifakı
Do not stop at “is there a title deed?” Ask what right is currently registered, whether the unit is identified as a bağımsız bölüm in the approved project, and whether its number, floor and arsa payı match the premises being sold. Kat İrtifakı is tied to a construction project and planned independent units, whereas Kat Mülkiyeti reflects condominium ownership after the relevant completion/registration process. If a long-occupied building still shows construction servitude, ask why; the label alone does not prove either illegality or safety.
Ask for the occupancy permit (Yapı Kullanma İzin Belgesi/İskan) where relevant, later project amendments, and any changes to the independent-unit number or share. Compare the approved plan with the physical door location, floor, balconies and annexed spaces. If bank finance or a valuation is part of the purchase, obtain the lender’s or valuer’s requirements early rather than assuming every Kat İrtifakı property is treated identically.
Claims that require documentary support
Statements such as “it automatically becomes Kat Mülkiyeti”, “the occupancy permit definitely exists” or “there is no practical difference” should be tested against current official records. Utility connections or long-term occupation do not by themselves establish the title stage. The useful question is which current official document connects this exact unit to the legal stage claimed by the seller and what, if anything, remains to be completed.
Evidence and decision plan for Buyer Questions for Construction servitude status
For “Buyer Questions for Construction servitude status”, the practical objective is to equip the buyer with specific questions whose answers can be checked against documents rather than sales assurances. The review should distinguish what is proved now, what still depends on a missing or stale document, and what difference that gap makes to price, signing, payment, handover or later resale.
Evidence to assemble
- For “Buyer Questions for Construction servitude status”, match the property and party identifiers in the evidence to the asset and people actually involved; a correct document for the wrong unit or person does not close the check.
- For “Buyer Questions for Construction servitude status”, record issuer, source, issue or retrieval date and version where available, then distinguish an original/current record from a scan, translation, draft, expired copy or superseded version.
- For “Buyer Questions for Construction servitude status”, compare documentary status with the physical, payment or operational reality relevant to the topic and write down every unexplained difference before commitment.
- For “Buyer Questions for Construction servitude status”, convert each unresolved difference into a named condition: evidence required, person responsible, deadline and the consequence if the condition is not satisfied.
Official reference to recheck
The source register for “Buyer Questions for Construction servitude status” includes TKGM — Sıkça Sorulan Sorular (https://www.tkgm.gov.tr/sss). Use that source for the matters within its authority and recheck it when timing or rules are material; it does not replace a registry, engineering, tax, banking or contractual record that the specific decision separately requires.
Decision boundary
Close “Buyer Questions for Construction servitude status” only when the conclusion can be reproduced from evidence by another reviewer. A reasonable outcome may be proceed, proceed subject to a written condition, reprice, obtain specialist advice, or stop; uncertainty should remain visible instead of being converted into a positive statement.