Resale and Exit Review

A practical Resale and Exit Review workflow for Construction servitude status, focused on evidence, timing, record reconciliation, exception closure and an auditable decision.

Verified facts relevant to this topic

Purpose of this guide

Resale and Exit Review — Construction servitude status applies an operational verification workflow to Construction servitude status. The specific objective is to test whether the current point could impair future resale, financing, transferability or the breadth of the buyer pool. A fact should not be treated as operationally reliable merely because it exists; it must be tied to the correct property, party and date and supported by evidence that another reviewer can audit later.

When to use this review

Before signing a contract or amendment that changes rights or obligations.
Before sending money or changing a beneficiary or account.
When a new version of a previously relied-on document arrives.
When there is a restriction, unusual feature or reliance on a narrow specialist buyer group.
When the database and a primary document or official source disagree.
Before final closing when the information can change over time.

Retrievable documentation

Financial and operational impact

Verified facts from official sources

Practical FAQ built from the record’s verified facts

What official fact about construction servitude (Kat İrtifakı) should a buyer verify before resale or exit?

Kat İrtifakı is a construction-servitude regime linked to a project and future/under-construction independent units; it is not automatically equivalent to Kat Mülkiyeti. Ask how a future buyer, bank or valuer will read the same data at exit. If an item already needs lengthy explanation, document the correction or resolution before purchase instead of exporting the problem to the next sale.

Which document fields or legal details on construction servitude (Kat İrtifakı) matter most before resale or exit?

Ask how a future buyer, bank or valuer will read the same data at exit. If an item already needs lengthy explanation, document the correction or resolution before purchase instead of exporting the problem to the next sale. Kat İrtifakı is a construction-servitude regime linked to a project and future/under-construction independent units; it is not automatically equivalent to Kat Mülkiyeti. TKGM guidance links this status to architectural projects, units and land shares; since the nationwide 3D-building-model rollout in 2025, digital model consistency has become increasingly important.

What can go wrong with construction servitude (Kat İrtifakı) before resale or exit, and what evidence resolves it?

TKGM guidance links this status to architectural projects, units and land shares; since the nationwide 3D-building-model rollout in 2025, digital model consistency has become increasingly important. Ask how a future buyer, bank or valuer will read the same data at exit. If an item already needs lengthy explanation, document the correction or resolution before purchase instead of exporting the problem to the next sale.

Sources for this section were reviewed on 16 August 2026.

Evidence and decision plan for Resale and Exit Review — Construction servitude status

The due-diligence purpose of “Resale and Exit Review — Construction servitude status” is to test how the present legal, technical and financial evidence will affect a later sale, refinancing or buyer due diligence. A reviewer should be able to trace every material conclusion to a current source and identify any assumption that has not yet become evidence.

Evidence to assemble

For “Resale and Exit Review — Construction servitude status”, match the property and party identifiers in the evidence to the asset and people actually involved; a correct document for the wrong unit or person does not close the check.
For “Resale and Exit Review — Construction servitude status”, record issuer, source, issue or retrieval date and version where available, then distinguish an original/current record from a scan, translation, draft, expired copy or superseded version.
For “Resale and Exit Review — Construction servitude status”, compare documentary status with the physical, payment or operational reality relevant to the topic and write down every unexplained difference before commitment.
For “Resale and Exit Review — Construction servitude status”, convert each unresolved difference into a named condition: evidence required, person responsible, deadline and the consequence if the condition is not satisfied.

Official reference to recheck

The source register for “Resale and Exit Review — Construction servitude status” includes TKGM — Tapu ve Kadastro Genel Müdürlüğü (https://www.tkgm.gov.tr/anasayfa). Use that source for the matters within its authority and recheck it when timing or rules are material; it does not replace a registry, engineering, tax, banking or contractual record that the specific decision separately requires.

Decision boundary

For “Resale and Exit Review — Construction servitude status”, a residual issue should remain open whenever its legal, technical, tax, payment or cost consequence cannot yet be measured. The file is ready only when that issue is closed or consciously accepted by the appropriate decision-maker.

Reviewing kat irtifakı before exit

Before resale, determine whether the unit remains under kat irtifakı or whether registration changed during ownership. If the status is unchanged, prepare a clear explanation supported by the current registry and any reliable evidence about the conversion process, without presenting an unverified future date as a fact.

If conversion to kat mülkiyeti occurred, preserve both the former and current evidence and the path between them. This shows a future buyer that differences in historic documents are explained by a real registration change rather than by uncertainty over the asset’s legal identity.

Resale and Exit Review — Construction servitude status