Closing-Day Recheck — Construction servitude status
A practical Closing-Day Recheck workflow for Construction servitude status, focused on evidence, timing, record reconciliation, exception closure and an auditable decision.
Verified facts relevant to this topic
Purpose of this guide
Closing-Day Recheck — Construction servitude status applies an operational verification workflow to Construction servitude status. The specific objective is to recheck changeable points on the closing day itself so final execution does not rely on information that became stale between review and signature. A fact should not be treated as operationally reliable merely because it exists; it must be tied to the correct property, party and date and supported by evidence that another reviewer can audit later.
When to use this review
- Before signing a contract or amendment that changes rights or obligations.
- Before sending money or changing a beneficiary or account.
- When a new version of a previously relied-on document arrives.
- When there is arrival of the final signature or transfer day.
- When the database and a primary document or official source disagree.
- Before final closing when the information can change over time.
Starting point
Execution sequence
- Define the critical point and pass criterion.
- Retrieve the current source or request the primary document.
- Cross-check names, identifiers, dates, amounts and rights.
- Log every conflict or gap explicitly.
- Assign an owner and closure date to each open point.
- Turn unresolved material points into written pre-commitment conditions.
- Recheck changeable information at the actual decision moment.
- Archive the pass, conditional-pass or stop decision with its reason.
Verified facts from official sources
Closing-day recheck
Practical FAQ built from the record’s verified facts
What official fact about construction servitude (Kat İrtifakı) should a buyer verify on the closing / transfer day?
Kat İrtifakı is a construction-servitude regime linked to a project and future/under-construction independent units; it is not automatically equivalent to Kat Mülkiyeti. On transfer day, recheck sensitive identifiers from the latest available source; do not assume last week’s verification is still sufficient. Confirm that every promised correction or update is actually reflected before signature and final payment.
Which document fields or legal details on construction servitude (Kat İrtifakı) matter most on the closing / transfer day?
On transfer day, recheck sensitive identifiers from the latest available source; do not assume last week’s verification is still sufficient. Confirm that every promised correction or update is actually reflected before signature and final payment. Kat İrtifakı is a construction-servitude regime linked to a project and future/under-construction independent units; it is not automatically equivalent to Kat Mülkiyeti. TKGM guidance links this status to architectural projects, units and land shares; since the nationwide 3D-building-model rollout in 2025, digital model consistency has become increasingly important.
What can go wrong with construction servitude (Kat İrtifakı) on the closing / transfer day, and what evidence resolves it?
TKGM guidance links this status to architectural projects, units and land shares; since the nationwide 3D-building-model rollout in 2025, digital model consistency has become increasingly important. On transfer day, recheck sensitive identifiers from the latest available source; do not assume last week’s verification is still sufficient. Confirm that every promised correction or update is actually reflected before signature and final payment.
Sources for this section were reviewed on 16 August 2026.
- TKGM — Kat İrtifakı ve Kat Mülkiyeti Genelgesi
- TKGM — 3D Building Model Project
- TKGM — Hatay 3B Kadastro Bilgilendirme
Evidence and decision plan for Closing-Day Recheck — Construction servitude status
For “Closing-Day Recheck — Construction servitude status”, the practical objective is to repeat the critical checks immediately before completion so stale evidence is not mistaken for current status. The review should distinguish what is proved now, what still depends on a missing or stale document, and what difference that gap makes to price, signing, payment, handover or later resale.
Evidence to assemble
- For “Closing-Day Recheck — Construction servitude status”, match the property and party identifiers in the evidence to the asset and people actually involved; a correct document for the wrong unit or person does not close the check.
- For “Closing-Day Recheck — Construction servitude status”, record issuer, source, issue or retrieval date and version where available, then distinguish an original/current record from a scan, translation, draft, expired copy or superseded version.
- For “Closing-Day Recheck — Construction servitude status”, compare documentary status with the physical, payment or operational reality relevant to the topic and write down every unexplained difference before commitment.
- For “Closing-Day Recheck — Construction servitude status”, convert each unresolved difference into a named condition: evidence required, person responsible, deadline and the consequence if the condition is not satisfied.
Official reference to recheck
The source register for “Closing-Day Recheck — Construction servitude status” includes TKGM — Tapu ve Kadastro Genel Müdürlüğü (https://www.tkgm.gov.tr/anasayfa). Use that source for the matters within its authority and recheck it when timing or rules are material; it does not replace a registry, engineering, tax, banking or contractual record that the specific decision separately requires.
Decision boundary
Close “Closing-Day Recheck — Construction servitude status” only when the conclusion can be reproduced from evidence by another reviewer. A reasonable outcome may be proceed, proceed subject to a written condition, reprice, obtain specialist advice, or stop; uncertainty should remain visible instead of being converted into a positive statement.
Rechecking kat irtifakı on closing day
On transfer day, review the registry again because the development may be in a period of registration change. Confirm that the unit, share and status are the same as those accepted by the buyer and that any expected conversion to kat mülkiyeti has actually occurred before describing it as completed.
If a new document arrives on closing day, do not let timing pressure replace review. Match its number, date and unit identity before proceeding. The final decision must use the present proven status, not a state that someone says “will appear in the system later.”
