Contract and Property Data Mismatch Check
Core point
Reconcile contract data with official property identity: ada/parsel, independent-unit number, address, area, title type and seller.
How to verify it
A marketing door number may legitimately differ from the registry unit number, but the difference must be explained in writing before payment so the buyer does not acquire another unit.
Decision impact
If the contract, plan or annex conflicts with the title record, determine which document will be corrected and who has authority to correct it before final signature.
When a contract-to-property mismatch should stop the transaction
Not every textual difference has the same consequence. Classify the conflicting field first: owner name, ada/parsel, independent unit, property type, area, price or an appurtenant right. If the difference changes the identity of the asset, party or right being transferred, stop signing and payment until both the authoritative source and the contract version are corrected. A potentially explainable difference such as transliteration of a foreign name should still be documented against the identity document rather than left for the next reviewer to guess.
Compare the current TKGM record with the contract, any power of attorney, and the listing or technical documents that shaped negotiations. Correcting the contract does not repair an error in the registry, and a correct registry does not make a materially wrong contractual description harmless. After correction, issue a dated final version and remove superseded drafts from the signing route while retaining them in the audit file. The record can then show which data supported price and payment decisions and exactly what changed before transfer.
Value-bearing appurtenances such as a parking space, storage area or land share also need reconciliation. If the contract promises an area or right that cannot be linked to the registry or approved project, changing marketing wording is not a cure. Determine whether it is a registered right, common area or merely current use, then align the contract and price with the proved status.
If the contract conflicts with the registry on a material identifier, do not manually choose the value that “looks closest.” Trace the field to the source authorised to establish it, then correct the contract or amendment explicitly so both documents point to the same asset.
Topic-specific tests Tie every material term to the property identifier, price, currency, payment schedule, handover and default/termination rules; keep material promises inside the written text.
Use two-channel verification: information from the counterparty plus independent confirmation from a known register, authority or bank.