Closing-Day Recheck — Cadastral boundary
Primary official evidence
Confirm that the parcel being transferred is the same parcel reviewed earlier, then compare the latest official cadastral/registry information with the boundary evidence relied on in the transaction. If area, parcel number or boundary position differs, resolve it before completion. On the completion date, rely on the latest official position for facts that can change and resolve any material mismatch before signature or release of funds.
Key verification points
No. Parcel Query is useful for spatial cross-checking, but a material boundary dispute should be resolved through the competent cadastral/registry process and, where needed, an official application or survey. Do not treat a screen map as a substitute for a formal boundary determination.
Document and identity reconciliation
Use the competent authority’s current cadastral/registry result and any official application or survey that explains the discrepancy. The closing file should show how the parcel identity, area and boundary used in the transaction were reconciled.
Timing and change risk
No. A fence, wall or visible occupation line can be useful context, but it is not by itself an official cadastral boundary determination. If the physical line differs from cadastral information, obtain the competent authority’s current application or survey result before relying on the usable area.
Decision standard
Yes. The parcel number can stay the same while an official correction, survey result or registry update changes the recorded area or boundary description. Reconcile the current cadastral/registry area and the reason for the difference before completion instead of assuming the unchanged parcel number closes the issue. On the completion date, rely on the latest official position for facts that can change and resolve any material mismatch before signature or release of funds.
Additional source-grounded detail
For Closing-Day Recheck — Cadastral boundary, TKGM Parcel Query is useful for orienting the parcel in the official cadastral context, but a screen display should not be treated as a formal determination of a disputed boundary. Where the legal line matters on the ground, compare the current parcel identity and area with the competent cadastral result and, when needed, an official aplikasyon or survey product. The closing file should make clear which official result was relied on and its date. On the completion date, rely on the latest official position for facts that can change and resolve any material mismatch before signature or release of funds.
Additional source-grounded detail
For Closing-Day Recheck — Cadastral boundary, A fence, garden wall, access track or long-standing line of occupation can be relevant physical evidence, but none of them changes the cadastral boundary by appearance alone. If the physical occupation does not coincide with the official parcel information, the discrepancy should be resolved through the competent cadastral process before usable area, access or a price assumption is accepted. Record the affected edge, adjoining parcel and any official measurement reference available.
Additional source-grounded detail
For Closing-Day Recheck — Cadastral boundary, Boundary evidence can change after a correction, subdivision, merger, renewal of cadastral work or a later official application. A closing-day review should therefore check whether the parcel number, registered area or boundary evidence used earlier is still the current result. If a later official document supersedes the earlier one, keep both versions and explain the change rather than silently replacing the evidence. On the completion date, rely on the latest official position for facts that can change and resolve any material mismatch before signature or release of funds.