Cross-Party Consistency Check — Preliminary sale contract
Primary official evidence
Turkish law gives particular legal effects to real-estate sale promises made in the required form, and TKGM publishes procedures for annotation in the land register. Verify the form and any claimed annotation from the official record rather than from the contract label alone. Compare the same identifiers across seller, buyer, representative, issuer and official record; a material mismatch needs reconciliation from the competent source.
Key verification points
Buyer and seller identity data, and any representative capacity, should refer to the same parties across the operative contract, amendments and official application. Resolve material name, identity-number or authority differences before further commitment.
Document and identity reconciliation
The contract should identify the intended property unambiguously and be checked against the available title/registry data: location, parcel/block where applicable, independent unit and ownership details. Do not rely on a project marketing name alone.
Timing and change risk
Compare the operative contract and signed amendments for total price, currency, payment dates, credited amounts and balance. A payment instruction that conflicts with the signed contract should be clarified and documented before funds move.
Decision standard
Identify the latest operative amendment and read it together with the original contract. Any change to parties, property, price, deadlines or payment terms should also be reflected in the closing file where relevant.
For Cross-Party Consistency Check — Preliminary sale contract, What official evidence should control this check?
For Cross-Party Consistency Check — Preliminary sale contract, repeat the key check through an independent official channel before a material financial decision; do not rely only on an image supplied by a party. A preliminary sale promise is not itself a transfer of title. Verify the required official form, exact property, parties, price and deadlines, then check whether a land-register annotation exists and what its scope and date are. TKGM defines Satış Vaadi Şerhi as annotation of a notarized promise to sell in the land register, while the Ministry of Justice explains that notaries can prepare such contracts and request annotation through the land-registry system when requirements are met.
For Cross-Party Consistency Check — Preliminary sale contract, Which details must match across the transaction file?
For Cross-Party Consistency Check — Preliminary sale contract, freeze the accepted evidence set before any non-refundable commitment and reopen review after any later change. A preliminary sale promise is not itself a transfer of title. Verify the required official form, exact property, parties, price and deadlines, then check whether a land-register annotation exists and what its scope and date are. TKGM defines Satış Vaadi Şerhi as annotation of a notarized promise to sell in the land register, while the Ministry of Justice explains that notaries can prepare such contracts and request annotation through the land-registry system when requirements are met.
For Cross-Party Consistency Check — Preliminary sale contract, What discrepancy requires further verification?
For Cross-Party Consistency Check — Preliminary sale contract, reconcile document number, date, pages and annexes with the version used for the decision, and close any version conflict. A preliminary sale promise is not itself a transfer of title. Verify the required official form, exact property, parties, price and deadlines, then check whether a land-register annotation exists and what its scope and date are. TKGM defines Satış Vaadi Şerhi as annotation of a notarized promise to sell in the land register, while the Ministry of Justice explains that notaries can prepare such contracts and request annotation through the land-registry system when requirements are met. Compare the same identifiers across seller, buyer, representative, issuer and official record; a material mismatch needs reconciliation from the competent source.