Skip to content
+90 505 506 38 10
JUANA Real Estate logo List Your Property My JUANA
+90 505 506 38 10 WhatsApp

Earthquake risk screening Recordkeeping Guide

Start with AFAD site hazard and building age/system, and tie both to the exact property, party and transaction date. For the recordkeeping, test the strongest claim first. If alterations conflicts with technical reports, preserve both pieces of evidence and identify the reason for the conflict before treating the file as complete. Example: the file contains AFAD site hazard, but Riskli Yapı records cannot be verified.

Author / reviewer: JUANA Real Estate Last reviewed: 2026-08-20
Earthquake risk screening Recordkeeping Guide

Earthquake risk screening Recordkeeping Guide

File objective

Evidence archive

  • AFAD site hazard
  • building age/system
  • alterations
  • technical reports
  • Riskli Yapı records

Version discipline

For the recordkeeping, test the strongest claim first. If alterations conflicts with technical reports, preserve both pieces of evidence and identify the reason for the conflict before treating the file as complete.

Audit trail

Resale retention

Transaction example

Checklist before closure

  • AFAD site hazard
  • building age/system
  • alterations
  • technical reports
  • Riskli Yapı records

Evidence set

Test risk independently before using recordkeeping as supporting evidence. This prevents a secondary document from validating an incorrect primary assumption.

Retention

Custody

Audit output

Record scope

Version trail

Earthquake risk screening — Recordkeeping

Source-grounded facts

How to use these facts

Primary sources

  • AFAD
  • AFAD
  • AFAD

Official source: AFAD Hazard Map

Verified information for Earthquake risk screening

compare documentary status with the physical, payment or operational reality relevant to the topic and write down every unexplained difference before commitment.

convert each unresolved difference into a named condition: evidence required, person responsible, deadline and the consequence if the condition is not satisfied.

Decision consequence Preserve building coordinates/address, AFAD hazard result/date, permits, engineering reports, inspection photos, any Riskli Yapı determination and the identity/authorization of the assessor.

Limits and exceptions Preserve building coordinates/address, AFAD hazard result/date, permits, engineering reports, inspection photos, any Riskli Yapı determination and the identity/authorization of the assessor.

Required reconciliation Preserve building coordinates/address, AFAD hazard result/date, permits, engineering reports, inspection photos, any Riskli Yapı determination and the identity/authorization of the assessor.

For a durable transaction record, Risks include calling a district “safe” from a regional map, ignoring soil, construction quality and alterations, relying on a non-expert visual inspection, or confusing DASK insurance with structural safety. Insurance is not a seismic-safety certificate. For earthquake hazard versus building-specific risk, preserve the current official record, its date and the identifiers used to reach the conclusion.

AFAD’s current hazard map was published on 18 March 2018 and entered into force on 1 January 2019. AFAD explicitly says it is a hazard map, not a building-risk map; the interactive map also excludes local-site effects such as liquefaction, amplification and differential settlement. Preserve building coordinates/address, AFAD hazard result/date, permits, engineering reports, inspection photos, any Riskli Yapı determination and the identity/authorization of the assessor. This prevents importing conclusions from neighboring buildings.

Example: the file contains AFAD site hazard, but Riskli Yapı records cannot be verified. Do not mark “Earthquake risk screening Recordkeeping Guide” complete. Keep the issue open, obtain a current official record and document whether the mismatch changes payment, price, use, finance or closing.

Preserve building coordinates/address, AFAD hazard result/date, permits, engineering reports, inspection photos, any Riskli Yapı determination and the identity/authorization of the assessor. This prevents importing conclusions from neighboring buildings.

For “Earthquake risk screening Recordkeeping Guide”, compare documentary status with the physical, payment or operational reality relevant to the topic and write down every unexplained difference before commitment.

Frequently asked questions

How does earthquake hazard versus building-specific risk affect a foreign buyer?

AFAD’s current hazard map was published on 18 March 2018 and entered into force on 1 January 2019. AFAD explicitly says it is a hazard map, not a building-risk map; the interactive map also excludes local-site effects such as liquefaction, amplification and differential settlement. Preserve building coordinates/address, AFAD hazard result/date, permits, engineering reports, inspection photos, any Riskli Yapı determination and the identity/authorization of the assessor. This prevents importing conclusions from neighboring buildings. This record applies that evidence specifically to earthquake hazard versus building-specific risk, and should be reconciled to the exact property rather than generalized from another unit.

What evidence should be fixed first when applying “Earthquake risk screening Recordkeeping Guide” to a live transaction?

This article has one purpose: resolve the question raised by “Earthquake risk screening Recordkeeping Guide” for the topic Earthquake risk screening. Start with AFAD site hazard and building age/system, and tie both to the exact property, party and transaction date.

Which translation or representation issue can matter — earthquake hazard versus building-specific risk?

Preserve building coordinates/address, AFAD hazard result/date, permits, engineering reports, inspection photos, any Riskli Yapı determination and the identity/authorization of the assessor. This prevents importing conclusions from neighboring buildings. For earthquake hazard versus building-specific risk, preserve the current official record, its date and the identifiers used to reach the conclusion.

What kind of discrepancy should trigger re-verification in “Earthquake risk screening Recordkeeping Guide”?

This article has one purpose: resolve the question raised by “Earthquake risk screening Recordkeeping Guide” for the topic Earthquake risk screening. Start with AFAD site hazard and building age/system, and tie both to the exact property, party and transaction date.

What should be verified before a non-refundable payment — earthquake hazard versus building-specific risk?

Preserve building coordinates/address, AFAD hazard result/date, permits, engineering reports, inspection photos, any Riskli Yapı determination and the identity/authorization of the assessor. This prevents importing conclusions from neighboring buildings. For earthquake hazard versus building-specific risk, an unresolved conflict remains a transaction condition until the competent record or authority resolves it.

Sources

Related content

Closing-Day Check for Earthquake risk screeningEarthquake risk screening Red Flags GuideEarthquake Risk, Structural Inspection and Building-Age Due DiligenceOfficial Source Revalidation — Earthquake risk screening
Real Estate Academy
JUANA Intelligent Site AgentKnows JUANA public sections, pages and content
Would you like an advisor to contact you?
The agent searches public site content only. Chat and browsing data may be stored to improve service and connect your request with the sales team. Private admin/client data is never exposed.