Buyer Questions for Earthquake risk screening
Core question
Treat this as a transaction decision file. begin with earthquake and risk and make sure both relate to the same asset, party and review date.
Practical cure
Cure the issue by re-pulling the competent official record, reconciling identifiers, comparing versions and documenting why the new evidence supersedes the old.
Decision rule
Use PASS only when current evidence supports the transaction assumption. Use CONDITIONAL for a dated written cure and STOP for unresolved issues that can alter ownership, lawful use, payment safety, financing, possession or title transfer.
Independent check
Check screening independently from the person or document that supplied earthquake. If it conflicts with buyer, identify the authoritative owner of the fact and obtain a fresh record.
Failure scenario
Failure example: earthquake looks correct, but questions belongs to a different date, unit or transaction. Keep the issue open and record whether it affects price, payment, use, finance, possession or registration.
- date
- earthquake
- screening
- questions
- buyer
- source
Mark each as verified, conflicting, stale or unavailable.
- screening
- date
- risk
- source
- official
- buyer
Audit trail
Record-specific evidence matrix
| Item | Cross-check | Status |
|---|---|---|
| source | buyer | Open / Verified |
| questions | earthquake | Open / Verified |
| date | screening | Open / Verified |
Earthquake risk screening — Buyer questions
Source-grounded facts
How to use these facts
For every claim ask for a verifiable number/date/copy: who issued it, is there a newer version, and is there any debt, exception or expiry?
Primary sources
- AFAD
- AFAD
- AFAD
What the record proves
Required reconciliation
Limits and exceptions
Decision consequence
2026 update
FAQ
How can earthquake hazard versus building-specific risk affect the legal ability to use the property?
AFAD’s current hazard map was published on 18 March 2018 and entered into force on 1 January 2019. AFAD explicitly says it is a hazard map, not a building-risk map; the interactive map also excludes local-site effects such as liquefaction, amplification and differential settlement. Ask the construction year, permit/occupancy documents, structural system, strengthening or removed columns/walls, prior earthquake damage, engineering reports, any 6306 Riskli Yapı determination, and any active urban-transformation process.
Which authority or document controls the answer — earthquake hazard versus building-specific risk?
Ask the construction year, permit/occupancy documents, structural system, strengthening or removed columns/walls, prior earthquake damage, engineering reports, any 6306 Riskli Yapı determination, and any active urban-transformation process.
What should not be inferred from marketing material — earthquake hazard versus building-specific risk?
Primary sources
Official source: AFAD Hazard Map
Verified information for Earthquake risk screening
compare documentary status with the physical, payment or operational reality relevant to the topic and write down every unexplained difference before commitment.
convert each unresolved difference into a named condition: evidence required, person responsible, deadline and the consequence if the condition is not satisfied.
Verified information for Earthquake risk screening
screening date risk source official buyer Audit trail Retain source URL, check date, property identifiers, document version, reviewer, exception owner and refresh trigger so the result can be reproduced later.
Verified information for Earthquake risk screening
For “Buyer Questions for Earthquake risk screening”, compare documentary status with the physical, payment or operational reality relevant to the topic and write down every unexplained difference before commitment.