Identify the parcel in TKGM data, then read its applicable plan through e-Plan/competent planning records. Record the exact land-use notation and plan scale, and read the legend and plan notes that define what that notation permits or restricts. Terms used in advertising—“residential”, “commercial”, “villa land”, “investment land”—can be broader than the legally effective plan category. If a development assumption matters to value, obtain the official zoning-status information and do not infer buildability from category name alone.
Documented encyclopedia enrichment: Official Source Revalidation — Land-use classification
Land-use classification is a planning decision that directly affects permitted use, value assumptions, and risk. Advertising a property as residential or commercial does not prove the official classification. Match the parcel to the competent plan, read its symbols, notes, and implementation conditions, and document any announced amendment or transitional decision affecting use.
Verification method
Official-source revalidation should be performed independently of the copy already in the file. Record the authority or source, access time, reference number where available, and whether the result matches, updates, or conflicts with existing evidence. If the official source cannot be accessed, the old copy does not automatically become “confirmed.” Distinguish an authoritative record from private guidance or commentary.
Evidence file
The evidence file should contain the reviewed document, reference or application number where available, retrieval date and time, reviewer, and any earlier version used for comparison. If the information can change, record the effective date of the review and the recheck point. These details prevent a result that was correct on an earlier date from becoming a permanent assumption after the register or transaction circumstances change.
Review checklist
When applying this record to “Official Source Revalidation — Land-use classification”, review at least five elements: property identity, identity and authority of the parties, date of the source or document, any open restriction or exception, and whether the decision requires revalidation before registration or payment release. If any element conflicts with an official source, reliance on the result should stop until the resolution is documented.
Reliance decision
At the end of the review, record a clear status: confirmed, confirmed with conditions, further evidence required, or currently unacceptable. Link the status to the document that resolved each point, with verification date and authority or reference. If the transaction remains open, identify the next action, owner, and deadline. A longer file should not automatically receive a higher confidence level; quality depends on verifiability and consistency of evidence.
