Building and Condominium Register Consistency Check

Ministry of Environment — Zoning FAQ — 15 August 2026

A Kat Mülkiyeti entry should be reconciled with the building and independent-unit records that describe the same physical premises. If the building record or approved project cannot be matched, treat the consistency check as incomplete even when ownership appears correctly registered.

Before closing, distinguish a confirmed ownership entry from unresolved building or condominium evidence. The unit number, floor, orientation, land share, approved project, occupancy status where relevant, and physical layout should describe the same property.

What should a buyer compare before relying on Kat Mülkiyeti condominium ownership?

Start from the fact that would change the deal if wrong. For “Construction servitude status Workflow Guide”, begin with construction and servitude and make sure both relate to the same asset, party and review date.

For İskan, the specific question is whether a Yapı Kullanma İzin Belgesi was issued for the relevant building/unit and whether it matches the current condition. Keep this separate from the mere existence of a building permit or utility account.

Match the physical unit to both registry and approved building records

A title number, door number and floor-plan label can refer to different numbering systems. Reconcile parcel/block identifiers first, then match the independent unit by floor, orientation, area and appurtenant land share. If the observed layout contains a closed balcony, merged units or rooms not shown on the plan, ownership-name matching alone does not resolve the discrepancy. Material differences should be explained before valuation or financing because they can affect later licensing and resale.

The Ministry of Environment operates the e-Plan planning automation system; future-use or infrastructure assumptions should be checked against the plan layer and notes applicable to the exact parcel. For the building condominium register consistency issue, use this evidence at the point of relying on the conclusion; do not substitute a generic document from another transaction.

Registry, approved project and physical building must reconcile

Start with the registered parcel, independent-unit number and ownership share, then locate the same unit on the approved architectural project and finally compare the physical premises. A flat’s existence in the building does not prove that its current layout matches the approved condominium record. Enclosed balconies, merged rooms, annexed common space or a unit-number change can create a material discrepancy. Record each difference and classify whether it is a harmless naming issue or a physical/legal change requiring municipal, technical or registry review.

Where the condominium register and approved project use different historic numbering, build an explicit cross-reference rather than guessing from floor area. The cross-reference should use block, floor, orientation and project annotations and should be retained with the title evidence so a future buyer can reproduce the match.

If the discrepancy affects floor, orientation or legal area rather than a label alone, pause valuation assumptions until the correct unit identity is established. Otherwise comparable sales and appraisal inputs may be attached to the wrong premises.

Evidence and decision plan for Building and Condominium Register Consistency Check

The due-diligence purpose of “Building and Condominium Register Consistency Check” is to build a clear, evidence-based answer to the topic itself. A reviewer should be able to trace every material conclusion to a current source and identify any assumption that has not yet become evidence.

Evidence to assemble

For “Building and Condominium Register Consistency Check”, match the property and party identifiers in the evidence to the asset and people actually involved; a correct document for the wrong unit or person does not close the check.
For “Building and Condominium Register Consistency Check”, record issuer, source, issue or retrieval date and version where available, then distinguish an original/current record from a scan, translation, draft, expired copy or superseded version.
For “Building and Condominium Register Consistency Check”, compare documentary status with the physical, payment or operational reality relevant to the topic and write down every unexplained difference before commitment.
For “Building and Condominium Register Consistency Check”, convert each unresolved difference into a named condition: evidence required, person responsible, deadline and the consequence if the condition is not satisfied.

Official reference to recheck

The source register for “Building and Condominium Register Consistency Check” includes TKGM — Parcel Query (https://parselsorgu.tkgm.gov.tr/). Use that source for the matters within its authority and recheck it when timing or rules are material; it does not replace a registry, engineering, tax, banking or contractual record that the specific decision separately requires.

Decision boundary

For “Building and Condominium Register Consistency Check”, a residual issue should remain open whenever its legal, technical, tax, payment or cost consequence cannot yet be measured. The file is ready only when that issue is closed or consciously accepted by the appropriate decision-maker.

Frequently asked questions

Which official source is most useful for “Building and Condominium Register Consistency Check”, and what does it establish?

For “Building and Condominium Register Consistency Check”: Condominium common expenses are governed by the Condominium Ownership Law, the management plan and valid owners’ decisions. A buyer should separate ordinary monthly aidat from extraordinary assessments, arrears and interest and obtain the unit ledger rather than relying on the amount quoted in a listing. Primary source used for the 16 August 2026 recheck: Mevzuat — Kat Mülkiyeti Kanunu No. 634. Keep the source URL and the transaction-specific evidence together; the source explains the rule or system, while the property file must prove how it applies to the exact unit or transaction.

What should remain in the evidence file after completing “Building and Condominium Register Consistency Check”?

For “Building and Condominium Register Consistency Check”: Use the current land-registry record as the controlling evidence, not a listing, screenshot or old deed copy. Reconcile the owner, independent-unit/parcel identity and any annotation, mortgage, attachment or easement before a payment or transfer decision; if the current record conflicts with the transaction file, the conflict must be resolved in the registry evidence first. Retain the source or primary document, its date/version, the exact property or counterparty identifier, the reviewer’s conclusion and the document that closes any exception. That record makes the decision reproducible instead of dependent on memory or a sales statement.

For the building condominium register consistency issue, what would make the official Web Tapu application trail materially change the conclusion in “Building and Condominium Register Consistency Check” before relying on the conclusion?

TKGM describes Web Tapu as the platform for online applications for land-registry transactions such as sale, mortgage and inheritance transfer before visiting the land-registry office. Use the official source as a control point, then reconcile it with the exact property, party, document and transaction purpose before relying on the conclusion. In “Building and Condominium Register Consistency Check”, this source is relevant specifically because it controls the official Web Tapu application trail. Before relying on the conclusion, compare that rule or dataset with the evidence for building condominium register consistency; a generic statement about another property is not enough.

Building and Condominium Register Consistency Check