Validity and Deadline Control — Structural inspection
Primary official evidence
structural inspection: Neither an AFAD hazard map result nor a DASK policy proves the structural safety of a particular building; cracks, alterations or other warning signs require building-specific engineering review and available structural records. Record the effective, issue, expiry or renewal date relevant to this evidence and test whether it is still fit for the transaction date.
Key verification points
Revalidate legal status and the list/role of authorized institutions through current Ministry material before relying on a structural-risk document.
Document and identity reconciliation
For Validity and Deadline Control — Structural inspection, Ask which structural system the building uses, whether performance or risky-building tests were carried out, whether strengthening or structural alterations occurred, who prepared the reports, their dates and scope, and whether any official notification or objection process exists.
Timing and change risk
For Validity and Deadline Control — Structural inspection, a structural inspection is not merely a visual visit. Cracking, moisture or deformation can be warning signs, but technical conclusions should rely on qualified engineering review, appropriate records and tests matched to the question being answered. If registry, project, numbering or share data changes after verification begins, preserve the old and new versions with date and reason. A valid change may be legitimate; relying on a superseded version is the real risk.
Decision standard
For Validity and Deadline Control — Structural inspection, a structural inspection is not merely a visual visit. Cracking, moisture or deformation can be warning signs, but technical conclusions should rely on qualified engineering review, appropriate records and tests matched to the question being answered. Preserve a file that can be handed to the next buyer: reference record, verification results, corrections, supporting documents and last-check date. A strong file shortens future due diligence and avoids rebuilding the property history from scratch.
For Validity and Deadline Control — Structural inspection, What official evidence should control this check?
For Validity and Deadline Control — Structural inspection, if registry, project, numbering or share data changes after verification begins, preserve the old and new versions with date and reason. A valid change may be legitimate; relying on a superseded version is the real risk. A structural inspection is not merely a visual visit. Cracking, moisture or deformation can be warning signs, but technical conclusions should rely on qualified engineering review, appropriate records and tests matched to the question being answered. If the question is whether the building is legally classified as Riskli Yapı, a generic private report is not enough. The formal process follows 6306 criteria and authorized bodies, and any objection or final determination should be checked.
For Validity and Deadline Control — Structural inspection, Which details must match across the transaction file?
For Validity and Deadline Control — Structural inspection, preserve a file that can be handed to the next buyer: reference record, verification results, corrections, supporting documents and last-check date. A strong file shortens future due diligence and avoids rebuilding the property history from scratch. A structural inspection is not merely a visual visit. Cracking, moisture or deformation can be warning signs, but technical conclusions should rely on qualified engineering review, appropriate records and tests matched to the question being answered. If the question is whether the building is legally classified as Riskli Yapı, a generic private report is not enough. The formal process follows 6306 criteria and authorized bodies, and any objection or final determination should be checked. Record the effective, issue, expiry or renewal date relevant to this evidence and test whether it is still fit for the transaction date.