Counterparty Confirmation — Occupancy permit status
What the official record proves
For “Counterparty Confirmation — Occupancy permit status”, the legal form of a document must be identified rather than assuming every private contract or notarized paper has the same effect. The Notary Law also allows notaries to execute real-estate sale contracts within the statutory system, while registry, identity and representation data remain decisive. Where a power of attorney is used, the authority relevant to sale, purchase, price handling, mortgage or the particular act is checked; broad wording should not be treated automatically as unlimited authority. For counterparty confirmation, versions, certifications, translations and attachments are preserved in sequence, and any change to a page, amount or party triggers re-verification before reliance.
Reconcile record and reality
For “Counterparty Confirmation — Occupancy permit status”, authenticity is established through the issuing authority and chain of acquisition, not by the appearance of a PDF or an institutional logo. If bank-account or payment instructions change by email or message, the change should be confirmed through an independent, previously verified channel before funds move; a genuine contract does not make later payment instructions automatically genuine. Official systems such as EİDS or Web Tapu prove only the elements within their scope and should not be used to legitimize unrelated data. For counterparty confirmation, preserve old and new versions, receipt time, sender, verification channel and result; that audit trail is what later exposes silent substitution or forged versions.
Limits of the evidence
For “Counterparty Confirmation — Occupancy permit status”, a building permit (Yapı Ruhsatı) must not be confused with the occupancy/use permit (Yapı Kullanma İzin Belgesi, commonly İskan). The former authorizes construction under the approved project; the latter concerns completion and lawful use through the competent process. Ministry guidance connects permit and occupancy procedures to technical and administrative requirements, and new-building procedures also interact with the Energy Performance Certificate. For counterparty confirmation, building/unit numbers, address and dates should be reconciled with the approved project and registry; a similarly titled document or incomplete image does not prove that the transacted unit is actually covered.
Decision consequence
For “Counterparty Confirmation — Occupancy permit status”, the land-registry record must be separated from marketing descriptions. TKGM lists party identification and, where representation is used, the representation document among sale-transaction materials; the registered owner, independent-unit details and recorded restrictions remain the controlling evidence when descriptions conflict. Names, identity or passport data and property identifiers should therefore be reconciled before signature, and the registry output relied upon should be preserved with its retrieval date. This is especially material to counterparty confirmation, because an unexplained identity or asset mismatch can change whether the transaction can proceed at all.
Primary and official sources
- TKGM — Kat İrtifakı ve Kat Mülkiyeti Genelge 2021/4 — https://www.tkgm.gov.tr/sites/default/files/2021-09/Kat%20Mu%CC%88lkiyeti%20Kat%20I%CC%87rtifak%C4%B1.pdf
- Ministry of Environment — Zoning FAQ — https://csb.gov.tr/sss-detay/18
- Ministry of Justice — Notary Law — https://mevzuat.adalet.gov.tr/mevzuat/103477
- Ministry of Environment — building permit / occupancy permit guidance — https://meslekihizmetler.csb.gov.tr/
- TKGM — sale transaction documents / Web Tapu — https://www.tkgm.gov.tr/sss
Evidence and decision plan for Counterparty Confirmation — Occupancy permit status
“Counterparty Confirmation — Occupancy permit status” should be handled as a decision file, not as a collection of documents. Its working objective is to obtain independent confirmation of material facts from the responsible party or issuer instead of relying on a forwarded copy alone. Evidence is useful only when it can be tied to the same property, party and decision date.
Evidence to assemble
- For “Counterparty Confirmation — Occupancy permit status”, match the property and party identifiers in the evidence to the asset and people actually involved; a correct document for the wrong unit or person does not close the check.
- For “Counterparty Confirmation — Occupancy permit status”, record issuer, source, issue or retrieval date and version where available, then distinguish an original/current record from a scan, translation, draft, expired copy or superseded version.
- For “Counterparty Confirmation — Occupancy permit status”, compare documentary status with the physical, payment or operational reality relevant to the topic and write down every unexplained difference before commitment.
- For “Counterparty Confirmation — Occupancy permit status”, convert each unresolved difference into a named condition: evidence required, person responsible, deadline and the consequence if the condition is not satisfied.
Official reference to recheck
The source register for “Counterparty Confirmation — Occupancy permit status” includes Ministry — Building Permit / Occupancy Process (https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/meslekihizmetler/haberler/yapi-ruhsati-yapi-kullanma--z-n-belges--surecler--20220328101647.pdf). Use that source for the matters within its authority and recheck it when timing or rules are material; it does not replace a registry, engineering, tax, banking or contractual record that the specific decision separately requires.
Decision boundary
The decision for “Counterparty Confirmation — Occupancy permit status” is not “document present / document absent.” It is whether the evidence is current, identifies the right asset and parties, resolves material conflicts and supports the next irreversible step.
Counterparty confirmation of occupancy-permit status
Ask the seller or developer to identify the Yapı Kullanma İzin Belgesi actually covering the building or relevant part, including number, date and issuing authority, then reconcile it with the municipal file. “The project is occupied” or the existence of utility bills is not a substitute for official permit status.