Resale and Exit Review — Reservation deposit

A practical Resale and Exit Review workflow for Reservation deposit, focused on evidence, timing, record reconciliation, exception closure and an auditable decision.

Verified facts relevant to this topic

Purpose of this guide

Resale and Exit Review — Reservation deposit applies an operational verification workflow to Reservation deposit. The specific objective is to test whether the current point could impair future resale, financing, transferability or the breadth of the buyer pool. A fact should not be treated as operationally reliable merely because it exists; it must be tied to the correct property, party and date and supported by evidence that another reviewer can audit later.

When to use this review

Before signing a contract or amendment that changes rights or obligations.
Before sending money or changing a beneficiary or account.
When a new version of a previously relied-on document arrives.
When there is a restriction, unusual feature or reliance on a narrow specialist buyer group.
When the database and a primary document or official source disagree.
Before final closing when the information can change over time.

Retrievable documentation

Financial and operational impact

Verified facts from official sources

Reservation deposit verification

Review how the item will appear to a future buyer or lender before treating the acquisition as investment-ready.

Practical FAQ built from the record’s verified facts

What official fact about reservation deposit / kapora should a buyer verify on the closing / transfer day?

Do not rely on the label “kapora” alone. State whether the payment is part of the price/evidence of the agreement or a withdrawal payment, and define refund, forfeiture, deadline and the exact property. Review how the item will appear to a future buyer or lender before treating the acquisition as investment-ready.

Which document fields or legal details on reservation deposit / kapora matter most on the closing / transfer day?

Review how the item will appear to a future buyer or lender before treating the acquisition as investment-ready. Do not rely on the label “kapora” alone. State whether the payment is part of the price/evidence of the agreement or a withdrawal payment, and define refund, forfeiture, deadline and the exact property. Article 177 of the Turkish Code of Obligations provides a default treatment for money paid at contract formation and does not automatically treat it as withdrawal money unless agreed otherwise; wording matters.

What can go wrong with reservation deposit / kapora on the closing / transfer day, and what evidence resolves it?

Article 177 of the Turkish Code of Obligations provides a default treatment for money paid at contract formation and does not automatically treat it as withdrawal money unless agreed otherwise; wording matters. Review how the item will appear to a future buyer or lender before treating the acquisition as investment-ready.

Sources for this section were reviewed on 16 August 2026.

Evidence and decision plan for Resale and Exit Review — Reservation deposit

The due-diligence purpose of “Resale and Exit Review — Reservation deposit” is to test how the present legal, technical and financial evidence will affect a later sale, refinancing or buyer due diligence. A reviewer should be able to trace every material conclusion to a current source and identify any assumption that has not yet become evidence.

Evidence to assemble

For “Resale and Exit Review — Reservation deposit”, match the property and party identifiers in the evidence to the asset and people actually involved; a correct document for the wrong unit or person does not close the check.
For “Resale and Exit Review — Reservation deposit”, record issuer, source, issue or retrieval date and version where available, then distinguish an original/current record from a scan, translation, draft, expired copy or superseded version.
For “Resale and Exit Review — Reservation deposit”, compare documentary status with the physical, payment or operational reality relevant to the topic and write down every unexplained difference before commitment.
For “Resale and Exit Review — Reservation deposit”, convert each unresolved difference into a named condition: evidence required, person responsible, deadline and the consequence if the condition is not satisfied.

Official reference to recheck

The source register for “Resale and Exit Review — Reservation deposit” includes TKGM — Tapu ve Kadastro Genel Müdürlüğü (https://www.tkgm.gov.tr/anasayfa). Use that source for the matters within its authority and recheck it when timing or rules are material; it does not replace a registry, engineering, tax, banking or contractual record that the specific decision separately requires.

Decision boundary

For “Resale and Exit Review — Reservation deposit”, a residual issue should remain open whenever its legal, technical, tax, payment or cost consequence cannot yet be measured. The file is ready only when that issue is closed or consciously accepted by the appropriate decision-maker.

Resale and Exit Review — Reservation deposit