Resale and Exit Review — Property valuation report
A practical Resale and Exit Review workflow for Property valuation report, focused on evidence, timing, record reconciliation, exception closure and an auditable decision.
Verified facts relevant to this topic
Purpose of this guide
Resale and Exit Review — Property valuation report applies an operational verification workflow to Property valuation report. The specific objective is to test whether the current point could impair future resale, financing, transferability or the breadth of the buyer pool. A fact should not be treated as operationally reliable merely because it exists; it must be tied to the correct property, party and date and supported by evidence that another reviewer can audit later.
When to use this review
- Before signing a contract or amendment that changes rights or obligations.
- Before sending money or changing a beneficiary or account.
- When a new version of a previously relied-on document arrives.
- When there is a restriction, unusual feature or reliance on a narrow specialist buyer group.
- When the database and a primary document or official source disagree.
- Before final closing when the information can change over time.
Retrievable documentation
Financial and operational impact
Verified facts from official sources
Valuation report verification
Review how this item will look to a future buyer or lender before treating the acquisition as investment-ready.
Practical FAQ built from the record’s verified facts
What official fact about property valuation report / TTB should a buyer verify on the closing / transfer day?
Check the report or TTB number, issue date, exact property/unit and the authority or system through which it was produced. A report for a similar property is not a substitute for the transaction property’s record. TKGM’s current FAQ states that valuation reports issued before 9 December 2024 were valid for three months, while Tutar Tespit Belgeleri (TTB) issued after that date are valid for six months. Review how this item will look to a future buyer or lender before treating the acquisition as investment-ready.
Which document fields or legal details on property valuation report / TTB matter most on the closing / transfer day?
Review how this item will look to a future buyer or lender before treating the acquisition as investment-ready. Check the report or TTB number, issue date, exact property/unit and the authority or system through which it was produced. A report for a similar property is not a substitute for the transaction property’s record. TKGM states that reports issued before 9 December 2024 followed a different validity rule, while TTB documents issued after that date are valid for six months; record the issue date and applicable regime carefully.
What can go wrong with property valuation report / TTB on the closing / transfer day, and what evidence resolves it?
TKGM states that reports issued before 9 December 2024 followed a different validity rule, while TTB documents issued after that date are valid for six months; record the issue date and applicable regime carefully. Review how this item will look to a future buyer or lender before treating the acquisition as investment-ready. TKGM’s current FAQ states that valuation reports issued before 9 December 2024 were valid for three months, while Tutar Tespit Belgeleri (TTB) issued after that date are valid for six months.
Sources for this section were reviewed on 16 August 2026.
Evidence and decision plan for Resale and Exit Review — Property valuation report
For “Resale and Exit Review — Property valuation report”, the practical objective is to test how the present legal, technical and financial evidence will affect a later sale, refinancing or buyer due diligence. The review should distinguish what is proved now, what still depends on a missing or stale document, and what difference that gap makes to price, signing, payment, handover or later resale.
Evidence to assemble
- For “Resale and Exit Review — Property valuation report”, match the property and party identifiers in the evidence to the asset and people actually involved; a correct document for the wrong unit or person does not close the check.
- For “Resale and Exit Review — Property valuation report”, record issuer, source, issue or retrieval date and version where available, then distinguish an original/current record from a scan, translation, draft, expired copy or superseded version.
- For “Resale and Exit Review — Property valuation report”, compare documentary status with the physical, payment or operational reality relevant to the topic and write down every unexplained difference before commitment.
- For “Resale and Exit Review — Property valuation report”, convert each unresolved difference into a named condition: evidence required, person responsible, deadline and the consequence if the condition is not satisfied.
Official reference to recheck
The source register for “Resale and Exit Review — Property valuation report” includes TKGM — Valuation Report FAQ (https://www.tkgm.gov.tr/tasinmaz-db-sikca-sorulan-sorular). Use that source for the matters within its authority and recheck it when timing or rules are material; it does not replace a registry, engineering, tax, banking or contractual record that the specific decision separately requires.
Decision boundary
Close “Resale and Exit Review — Property valuation report” only when the conclusion can be reproduced from evidence by another reviewer. A reasonable outcome may be proceed, proceed subject to a written condition, reprice, obtain specialist advice, or stop; uncertainty should remain visible instead of being converted into a positive statement.
Resale and exit review — valuation report
The valuation used at acquisition is historical evidence, not a guaranteed resale price. Preserve it to explain the original decision, but at exit reassess the current property condition, area, renovations, restrictions and market, and obtain a new valuation whenever required by the buyer, transaction or rules.
If the old report identified an area or legal-status discrepancy that was never resolved, that is an exit defect rather than merely an old number. File the evidence that closed each material observation alongside the report so the next buyer does not have to rediscover the issue from scratch.