Official Source Revalidation — Building permit status
Revalidate through the competent municipality/special administration and Ministry planning systems where applicable. Use TKGM for title/parcel facts, but use the planning authority for permit facts. building permit status: A building permit is a planning/construction record separate from title ownership; matching the property to the permit and approved project matters because a title deed alone does not prove the built structure complies with the permit.
Official source: Ministry of Environment
Official building-permit revalidation
Verify Yapı Ruhsatı directly with the municipality using the Ada/Parsel or permit number. Confirm issue date and current validity, then compare the approved Mimari Proje with the actual building to detect unauthorized area, extra floors or other Kaçak construction. Check the municipal file for demolition orders, administrative fines or amendments that would prevent normal completion or occupancy.
Required evidence
Keep the title copy, permit number and issue date, the municipality-approved architectural plan and any structural-control report linked to the permit. Record the municipal department and date of verification rather than relying on a developer photocopy.
Decision points
The supplied material notes the common five-year completion framework for building permits; if the construction has not been completed within the applicable period, determine whether renewal or a new permit is required before accepting the project as compliant. Establishing Kat İrtifakı depends on a lawful building and approved project. If the physical building and approved plan differ materially, stop the payment/acceptance process until the municipal status is corrected.
Source timing point: The source refers to a common five-year building-permit completion period and requires renewal/revalidation if the project remains incomplete after that period.
Evidence and decision plan for Official Source Revalidation — Building permit status
“Official Source Revalidation — Building permit status” should be handled as a decision file, not as a collection of documents. Its working objective is to return to the competent official source and verify that the prior conclusion still matches the current rule or record. Evidence is useful only when it can be tied to the same property, party and decision date.
Evidence to assemble
- For “Official Source Revalidation — Building permit status”, match the property and party identifiers in the evidence to the asset and people actually involved; a correct document for the wrong unit or person does not close the check.
- For “Official Source Revalidation — Building permit status”, record issuer, source, issue or retrieval date and version where available, then distinguish an original/current record from a scan, translation, draft, expired copy or superseded version.
- For “Official Source Revalidation — Building permit status”, compare documentary status with the physical, payment or operational reality relevant to the topic and write down every unexplained difference before commitment.
- For “Official Source Revalidation — Building permit status”, convert each unresolved difference into a named condition: evidence required, person responsible, deadline and the consequence if the condition is not satisfied.
Official reference to recheck
The source register for “Official Source Revalidation — Building permit status” includes Ministry of Environment — Planlı Alanlar İmar Yönetmeliği (https://csb.gov.tr/haberler/planli-alanlar-imar-yonetmeligi-resmi-gazete-de-yayimlandi-299279). Use that source for the matters within its authority and recheck it when timing or rules are material; it does not replace a registry, engineering, tax, banking or contractual record that the specific decision separately requires.
Decision boundary
The decision for “Official Source Revalidation — Building permit status” is not “document present / document absent.” It is whether the evidence is current, identifies the right asset and parties, resolves material conflicts and supports the next irreversible step.
Second-pass review for Official Source Revalidation — Building permit status
A second-pass review of “Official Source Revalidation — Building permit status” should test whether the first conclusion would survive a change of reviewer. Start from the underlying source rather than the previous summary, repeat the identity match, and check whether a later document, payment, amendment or physical change has altered the answer. The source register describes its relevance as: Official/primary source retained after strict archive cleaning; revalidate time-sensitive facts before a live transaction.
For “Official Source Revalidation — Building permit status”, keep a short discrepancy log that states the fact in question, the two conflicting pieces of evidence, the competent source chosen to resolve the conflict, and the transaction step held back while the discrepancy remains open.
At handover or file closure, “Official Source Revalidation — Building permit status” should leave a compact evidence package: the controlling document or source extract, supporting correspondence or technical evidence, the dated conclusion, and any condition the buyer accepted. This improves resale and future auditability without pretending that old evidence stays current forever.
Official revalidation of building-permit status
Verify the Yapı Ruhsatı with the municipality or competent planning authority using the property identifiers; a title deed is not a substitute for the permit file. Match permit number, date and approved project to the actual building and later amendments. If physical reality differs from the approved project, obtain an official explanation before treating the status as compliant.